bamawriter
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2010
- Messages
- 26,209
- Likes
- 16,429
No one is saying Alabama isn't as tradition filled or as successful a program as there is out there.
What the author is saying is that over the last 30 years - a significant time period - Auburn is at parity with Alabama BUT somehow viewed as inferior over that time period.
No one is saying Auburn has equalled the success of Alabama since each has been playing football.
Like I said, one can't argue AU's success over that time period. I'm just saying that picking a specific date because it maximizes your argument isn't hard and fast evidence of a the state of affairs.
Like I said, we could take the last 20 years and the facts shift. Aren't recent events more significant?