Who do you see that is better? With exception to the 3 you posted?They are explosive but they already proved they aren't better than LSU, Ohio State and Clemson has just as an explosive offense while having way better defenses. Maybe they should get the 4 seed, but they just don't deserve it honestly.
Who do you see that is better? With exception to the 3 you posted?
The term "deserve" is a bit meaningless IMO. The job of the committee is to put the best 4 in.....Oklahoma isn't better than bammer IMO and definitely not Baylor. Utah would have a better argument than OU or baylor IMOTo be honest, I think if OU or Baylor deserve to be in as one loss conference champs over Bama. But are they better than Bama? No so I guess you can't by rule, but it would be better for college football rewarding a champion over a non champion. Just my opinion.