No
It's a matter of either believing a majority of experts or believing in a minority of true believers.
She is singled out and mocked... but when guys like Gore say the earth is telling us to change... he's honored as a prophet.... I guess it is just a matter to which religion and deity you ascribe to, huh?
Really? What evidence? What has occurred within the last 100 years that has not happened cyclically for all of natural history? Man's activities will have some very minute impact.... but they always have. Living things produce bi-products that impact the environment. That is not a new "phenomenon". However that impact is roughly on the order of a scout team player's individual impact on a national championship in football.... and that's probably too generous. IIRC, 99% of green house gases are NATURALLY PRODUCED... and that is before you consider other factors like sun activity.Gore has some pretty concrete objective evidence to back him up.
How much more direct would you want?When she says that she is claiming that an intelligent being controls the universe and everything in it and in order to complain to us about budget deficits and too much homosexuality has chosen to cause an earthquake and a hurricane. It seems a real stretch since presumably He could be a bit more direct.
Oh. So what you are saying is that if you do the EXACT same thing but de-personalize it... then it is fine. It is only when you assign an active deity that it becomes a problem, right?When Gore says that, he's not implying there is some intelligent being choosing a path. He's saying the consequences of the path we are on is stress on the environment, which is reacting to that stress and the reaction "tells us" that we need to consider how we deal with the environment.
Someone seriously said that the earthquake was due to climate change. In fact, what doesn't the whacky environut crowd not attribute to climate change these days?The two are not really very comparable all. I mean, the budget deficit doesn't have anything to do with hurricanes. Or does it and I'm missing something?
How much more direct would you want?
I'm not agreeing with her... just asking what you are in fact looking for.
I don't know.
I am not saying that God is not responsible for hurricanes and earthquakes. If pressed, I suppose I would say that He created the world and everything in it and so therefore its His will. Do I think he pressed the "Earthquake" button on his remote control? I have a harder time with that, but in my world/religious view it is possible.
Where I start really scratching my head is the notion that God wreaks down upon us seemingly random natural disasters to signal us to cool it. If you believe in the destruction of cities or towns based on their poor morality in the Old Testament, okay. But that is where He either announced what He was going to do in advance or claimed responsibility for it later and explained then why He did it.
I just have a hard time believing that Michelle Bachmann has some sort of divine inspiration to tell us human beings that God caused Hurricane Irene specifically to let us know that He's pissed about too many homosexuals.
Saw the video - it was clearly a joke.
Yeah. I bet the good people of Vermont are laughing their asses off about it. Oh, wait, scratch that. Many of them are without power, or homes for that matter, due to this hurricane that was sent strictly as a political/moral message.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
ah, the sweet smell of sanctimonious rage