Bad look for the playoff committee so far [updated]

#1

UTFranklinVol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2023
Messages
999
Likes
1,923
#1
The first four playoff games have been horribly boring and uncompetitive. didn't expect Indiana or SMU or Clemson to win but certainly thought Tennessee would be better than this. I was right a few weeks back Tennessee was never a playoff worthy team, too many glaring issues on offense and clearly our defense can be added to that list now we left players wide open all over the field.

This 12 team format with home games is troubling because none of the home teams came anywhere close to losing. They need to reconsider both the seeding process and how they evaluate worthy teams because they screwed this up which I know isn't a surprise to most people.
 
Last edited:
#2
#2
Two playoff games down and both have been horribly boring and uncompetitive. didn't expect Indiana or SMU to win but certainly thought they would be better than this. Hopefully from now on strength of schedule becomes a more outsized factor in selecting teams. Someone in the SEC could have put on a better show than this garbage.

Here's hoping that someone is Tennessee lol GB🍊!
I has been a joke so far, but has been great for my wagers.
 
#5
#5
Two playoff games down and both have been horribly boring and uncompetitive. didn't expect Indiana or SMU to win but certainly thought they would be better than this. Hopefully from now on strength of schedule becomes a more outsized factor in selecting teams. Someone in the SEC could have put on a better show than this garbage.

Here's hoping that someone is Tennessee lol GB🍊!
I think they know that. This is what they want. For the BIG schools to look dominate
 
#13
#13
Strength Of Schedule is definitely starting to reveal itself... —Something that needs considerably more emphasis in future playoff seeding.

Call it “home-field advantage” or whatever…. But, even with a couple of late scores, It was pretty obvious that Indiana & SMU didn’t belong in the CFP.

— They fell behind early & often. And frankly, the games were both ugly & boring to watch.

I really expect to see the same thing from Clemson; ; Boise State; & even Arizona State, as well. - But you never know….

Oh well - At least they didn’t put Bama in there!
 
#14
#14
I know it's a very lengthy discussion, but there should be more divisions at the top level. Just having FBS and FCS isn't enough. FBS should be split into perhaps three divisions.
 
#15
#15
This is what happens when you apply DEI to college football. It’s bad on several levels. First, it’s going to discourage teams from scheduling other good teams during the regular season because they don’t want to take a loss. This produces a worse product in the regular season. Second, you get games like last night and today that aren’t competitive. This produces a worse product in the playoffs.

Schedules are too imbalanced for the “if a team has three losses they shouldn’t get in the playoffs” argument to hold water. I dislike Alabama as much as the next Tennessee fan, but if Alabama had played Indiana’s schedule, they would be 11-1 or 12-0. If Alabama had played SMU’s schedule, they would be 11-1 or 12-0. Conversely, if Indiana or SMU had played Alabama’s schedule, they would likely be 8-4 at best.
 
#16
#16
I don't really want the CFP to become the Big Ten/SEC invitational, but I think any objective person could see no reason to give two invites to the ACC. Quint Kessenich, who simultaneously covers lax for ESPN and has an absolutely lax name, said it pretty well. I'm having a hard time seeing SMU as better than the fourth-best team in the ACC. In fairness, I'd love to see a return to smaller conferences and far less of this unbalanced scheduling crap. And at the least, there need to be real divisions so you can have comparable schedules to differentiate teams at the top of conferences for CFP-invites.
 
  • Like
Reactions: perico and jsc1973
#17
#17
If they really wanted to go all in on making the B1G look good, they should have said no independents and found a way to get Indiana seeded against Marshall or something instead of Notre Dame.
 
#20
#20
Yeah.
The committee members are getting exactly what they wanted.
so far.
Sankey got what he wanted. Everything that’s happened as far as the SEC is on him. They set Texas up as well as they could. They wanted Texas and Georgia in. Really wanted Bama in as well but SMU wouldn’t do their part.
 
#22
#22
Two playoff games down and both have been horribly boring and uncompetitive. didn't expect Indiana or SMU to win but certainly thought they would be better than this. Hopefully from now on strength of schedule becomes a more outsized factor in selecting teams. Someone in the SEC could have put on a better show than this garbage.

Here's hoping that someone is Tennessee lol GB🍊!
I’ll be fine with a blowout tonight as long as it’s Tennessee doing the blowing out.
 

VN Store



Back
Top