volinbham
VN GURU
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2004
- Messages
- 69,798
- Likes
- 62,539
Only if capital gains tax stays in the game.how about taxing 100% of social security benefits?
Possibly... Meaning to say one government agency for all forms of cash benefit?i've said for years we should merge it into welfare.
Yesterday the US Treasury auctioned off $16 Billion worth of 30 year bonds at 4.38%
Any chance of us getting that kind of return on our $ we are putting in SS?
No other businesses do this PJ - particularly not those in the legal profession. Sheeesh.
Me me me? What about all the parents and grandparents that have been or are on SS now? Safe bet not rely on it and hope it's there. Too many people getting handouts imo. My dad drew one ss disablity check ae 56 died of brain cancer by the time they got his set up got one check. He paid in his entire life, good paying management jobs, worked full time job, part time job at night and worked on weekends and had a business for himself. I'm just saying it's not really fair in a lot of ways. But his drive carries on the his grand daughter MD in Santa Moncia and grandson full time college professor Tennessee (although he never knew this).
We are simply going to have to increase taxes on the top 5 percent, repeal the Bush tax cuts altogether, repeal big oil subsidies, extend retirement qualification age by 2-3 years, and cut defense.
Social Security, Medicare to run short sooner than expected - May. 13, 2011
Social Security will run a permanent yearly deficit when looking at the program’s tax revenues compared to what it must pay out in benefits, the program’s trustees said Friday in a report
while I understand the point, what has the gov't been doing with my money for 40-50 years if I only get the exact amount back out? Doesn't seem like a solid investment to me
We are simply going to have to increase taxes on the top 5 percent, repeal the Bush tax cuts altogether, repeal big oil subsidies, extend retirement qualification age by 2-3 years, and cut defense.
Social Security, Medicare to run short sooner than expected - May. 13, 2011
I think a lot of people in my age range (47) and who are directly affected arguably the most by this, have already come to understand and accept that full retirement will be more like 67 than 65.
But cutting benefits or taxing them (which effectively cuts them) is not something most people would agree to. Your proposal reeks of placing more of the burden on the middle class, which is what is blowing up in your collective face vis-a-vis the Ryan plan.
Cliffs:
1) Extending retirement age and eligibility for SS is politically doable, especially if in conjunction with salvaging of Medicare in close to current form.
2) Taxing SS benefits, means testing benefits, or cuts in benefits, will never, ever, ever pass because rightfully seen as another backdoor tax break for the wealthiest.
Your post displays the classic misunderstanding that most of the U.S. population has with respect to social security deductions taken out of their paychecks. Your money is NOT sitting in an investment account. It is being paid out to current retirees.
lol:That's among the dumbest posts that I've ever seen in this forum. Like ANY politician would ever even have the guts to utter these words.
I would forfeit everything I've pd in the last 20 years and future benefits if they allow me to completely get out of paying in the future.
Posted via VolNation Mobile