If nobody goes to jail over this then it just shows how much the banking and wall street money really owns this country.
It just doesn't get more clear cut than this.
Since large international banks are involved, I'm sure the Fed monitors developments, but I assume that the regulators on the ground are U.K.
US Senators accuse HSBC of letting Mexican gangs launder $7 billion and working with Saudi bank linked to terrorism * HSBC moved huge sum from Mexico into the U.S. between 2007 and 2008 * Provided services for Saudi Arabias Al Rajhi Bank linked to financing terrorism * Senate investigation suggests they also moved money tied to Iran * Accuses bank of pervasively polluted culture * Another hammer blow to the credibility of British banking system after Barclays was fined for allegedly rigging LIBOR interest rate HSBC has been accused of handling money from Mexican drugs cartels and working alongside ... (islamo/fascist terrorists)
The best way to rob a bank is to own it.
No one cares. I find this to be a pretty big deal. Exihibit A on how money and lobbies control the electorate. If it were another industry there would be prison terms. Instead, a chief executive gets a nice payout and presidential candidates get donations, and plenty of people got paid, basically cheating and griping about how much taxes they have to pay on what they stole after the fact.
But who cares right? We have a 350 post thread about chik fil a to worry about. SMDH.
Big part of why I stopped taking this forum seriously.No one cares. I find this to be a pretty big deal. Exihibit A on how money and lobbies control the electorate. If it were another industry there would be prison terms. Instead, a chief executive gets a nice payout and presidential candidates get donations, and plenty of people got paid, basically cheating and griping about how much taxes they have to pay on what they stole after the fact.
But who cares right? We have a 350 post thread about chik fil a to worry about. SMDH.
The Senate report criticized a "pervasively polluted" culture at the bank and said HSBC's Mexican operations had moved $7 billion into its U.S. operations between 2007 and 2008.
"The firm clearly lost its way in this regard and it's right that we apologize," said Gulliver. "Colleagues internally have been aware that this is the backdrop of why we had to change the firm."
"And the news is still coming out - we have yet to see the impact, if any, of the Libor investigation and HSBC's role in that. It's hard to see how much more bad news the markets can take," said the investor, who asked not to be named.
.The bank said it could clawback some past bonuses from staff involved in the problem, but declined to comment if that could include former Chief Executive Michael Geoghegan
No one cares. I find this to be a pretty big deal. Exihibit A on how money and lobbies control the electorate. If it were another industry there would be prison terms. Instead, a chief executive gets a nice payout and presidential candidates get donations, and plenty of people got paid, basically cheating and griping about how much taxes they have to pay on what they stole after the fact.
But who cares right? We have a 350 post thread about chik fil a to worry about. SMDH.
And this is exactly one of the reasons there is little doubt any kind of punishment with teeth will be brought down on those involved.
Romney to Fundraise with London Bankers Implicated in LIBOR Scandal | Daily Ticker - Yahoo! Finance
This is part of the problem.
Could this be the reason Romney was not going to allow the media to attend the event ?
The last I heard was the campaign changed their mind and would let the media attend but would have to leave before Romney started taking any questions from the attendees?
After my first reflection on my time at Citigroup was published, the company issued the following statement:
The allegations of this former employee, who last worked at Citi seven years ago, are unfounded and any implication that unethical behavior is accepted or rewarded by the firm is completely without merit. Citi strives to create the best outcome for its clients through conduct that is transparent, prudent and dependable.
For a bank to say this in the wake of the financial crisis seemed disingenuous at best. Now it just sounds laughable.
why? As soon as the names and faces are public, the complicit regulators will have no choice.