Barr fakery

#101
#101
hog88 said:
LOL

As far as AGs go he’s the best one we’ve had in over 20 years. Of course that’s not saying much.
Click to expand...

His slow, methodical, no-nonsense approach is driving them over the edge. Deep down, they know the Barr tab is comin due soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#102
#102
MontyPython said:
Funny stuff. Don't let facts get in your way.

What I accurately stated was Trump is attempting to interfere with a federal case. Federal cases preside in the judicial branch of our government. The end.

When and if the executive branch and specifically a President successfully controls other branches of government, you have by definition a Banana Republic. If you condone this, knock yourself out and move to one of those nations. Being a toadie Trump bootlicker is an ugly look for anyone.
Click to expand...

The facts are not only did the president NOT intervene "in a federal case" by commenting on the prosecutors shenanigans, but he has the constitutional power and duty to do so. Those federal prosecutors are also part and parcel of the EXECUTIVE branch; you don't even know where the two branches separate. You're talking out your rear with nothing to back it but more flatulence.

The ugly look is people yapping authoritatively about things you don't understand, have it explained to you, and remain undeterred, Mr. JUDICIAL branch. I condone separation of powers and constitutional law, while the fascist House left does not and attempts to subjugate both the presidency and Senate.

Lick that banana, apparatchik.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#105
#105
#106
#106
MontyPython said:
Funny stuff. Don't let facts get in your way.

What I accurately stated was Trump is attempting to interfere with a federal case. Federal cases preside in the judicial branch of our government. The end.

When and if the executive branch and specifically a President successfully controls other branches of government, you have by definition a Banana Republic. If you condone this, knock yourself out and move to one of those nations. Being a toadie Trump bootlicker is an ugly look for anyone.
Click to expand...

That's the problem with Trump supporters, the facts always get in the way but they hold their collective nose and look the other way. Trump and his supporters wallow in their self-pity and play the victim card (everybody is picking on me). Nothing is ever Trump's fault, someone else is always blamed for Trump's misdeeds. Self-responsibility is non-exist in the Trump Administration and his supporters are the very definition of fealty and blind allegiance living in a world of alternative facts just as they have instructed to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MontyPython, BowlBrother85 and luthervol
#107
#107
TN Ribs said:
That's the problem with Trump supporters, the facts always get in the way but they hold their collective nose and look the other way. Trump and his supporters wallow in their self-pity and play the victim card (everybody is picking on me). Nothing is ever Trump's fault, someone else is always blamed for Trump's misdeeds. Self-responsibility is non-exist in the Trump Administration and his supporters are the very definition of fealty and blind allegiance living in a world of alternative facts just as they have instructed to do.
Click to expand...

Lol. What facts are that? The fact dims are constantly crying over complete bs? The way the last administration acted in regard to the president and AGs are concerned it’s hard to take y’all weak a$$es seriously.
 
#108
#108
NCFisher said:
And tens of thousands of former and current prosecutors, etc. don't. Only you would be "wow'ed" by the same group of partisan and/or constitutionally ignorant retreads who said Trump committed obstruction. You're rabid; Trump or Barr couldn't pass gas without 'peach him!'
Click to expand...


How are GOP prosecutors partisan against Trump?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
#109
#109
C-south said:
Lol. What facts are that? The fact dims are constantly crying over complete bs? The way the last administration acted in regard to the president and AGs are concerned it’s hard to take y’all weak a$$es seriously.
Click to expand...
Your posts prove my point on a daily basis. You are the specimen in the jar.
 
#110
#110
BowlBrother85 said:
It's not saying anything at all, outside of how you feel about politics and the role an AG should play in politics.
Click to expand...

The AG is a political appointee, it’s a political position. You think Lynch or Holder would have held into their jobs if they weren’t advancing Obama’s agenda?
 
#112
#112
hog88 said:
The AG is a political appointee, it’s a political position. You think Lynch or Holder would have held into their jobs if they weren’t advancing Obama’s agenda?
Click to expand...


Don't recall Obama interfering via the atty general in prosecutions of his friends
 
#113
#113
hog88 said:
The AG is a political appointee, it’s a political position. You think Lynch or Holder would have held into their jobs if they weren’t advancing Obama’s agenda?
Click to expand...
The AG is the head of the Department of Justice. I take issue with calling that a political position. The agenda of the AG should never involve settling personal scores and carrying out vendettas for the president, much less trying to lighten sentences for his convicted felon friends.
 
#115
#115
luthervol said:
Barr has to decide, forever be a piece of crap in the eyes of the sane by continue to hump Trump's leg, or cling to any remaining shreds of decency and respect, and distance himself from Trump.
It's the decision everyone who ever works for Trump must make.
Click to expand...

So in your world destroying 33k emails is the action of a "respectfully decent" person and someone who lied to Congress should go to jail the rest of their life?
Or having a former president meet with the sitting AG to talk about "grandkids" is common?

5 more years. Winning is beautiful
 
#116
#116
BowlBrother85 said:
The AG is the head of the Department of Justice. I take issue with calling that a political position. The agenda of the AG should never involve settling personal scores and carrying out vendettas for the president, much less trying to lighten sentences for his convicted felon friends.
Click to expand...

Then why does the Senate have to vote to approve of it? And you have exactly zero proof that any scores are being settled. Only taking points from the msm and career hacks!
 
#117
#117
BowlBrother85 said:
The AG is the head of the Department of Justice. I take issue with calling that a political position. The agenda of the AG should never involve settling personal scores and carrying out vendettas for the president, much less trying to lighten sentences for his convicted felon friends.
Click to expand...

The first two sentences are correct.

The last sentence; Barr has not settled scores for the president nor undertaken it. Barr has every right to rein in rogue prosecutors, especially those who seem to be settling their own personal scores from the Mueller-egg on their faces. It's ridiculously punitive to attempt to imprison Stone for 8-9 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#118
#118
NCFisher said:
The first two sentences are correct.

The last sentence; Barr has not settled scores for the president nor undertaken it. Barr has every right to rein in rogue prosecutors, especially those who seem to be settling their own personal scores from the Mueller-egg on their faces. It's ridiculously punitive to attempt to imprison Stone for 8-9 years.
Click to expand...

But but but he lied to Congress and "intimidated" a guy and his dog. A guy who said that he was not intimidated and a dog who voted for Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher
#120
#120
BowlBrother85 said:
The AG is the head of the Department of Justice. I take issue with calling that a political position. The agenda of the AG should never involve settling personal scores and carrying out vendettas for the president, much less trying to lighten sentences for his convicted felon friends.
Click to expand...

It happens with every AG and POTUS, the AG is a political appointee within the executive branch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vols40
#122
#122
NCFisher said:
The first two sentences are correct.

The last sentence; Barr has not settled scores for the president nor undertaken it. Barr has every right to rein in rogue prosecutors, especially those who seem to be settling their own personal scores from the Mueller-egg on their faces. It's ridiculously punitive to attempt to imprison Stone for 8-9 years.
Click to expand...
The fact is, a jury found Roger Stone guilty of a whopping 7 felonies... a 7-9 year sentence, is not inconsistent with that at all.
 
#124
#124
BowlBrother85 said:
No, it does not.
Click to expand...

Of course it doesn't happen with every AG and POTUS. It's a typical argument for anything Trump does by his supporters though, everybody does it so it's OK regardless of whether it's right or wrong - that's their go-to response these days; the two wrongs make a right defense which is intellectually lazy and morally bankrupt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
#125
#125
lawgator1 said:
How are GOP prosecutors partisan against Trump?
Click to expand...

That's such a facile argument, as a list of Republicans who opposed his 2016 campaign illustrates: List of Republicans who opposed the 2016 Donald Trump presidential campaign - Wikipedia

Some undoubtedly have come around because Democrats are running a batch of socialists and radicals, and due to the the baseless FBI probes and abuses. Democrats and their media guard dogs can take most of the credit for making Trump palatable.
Many Repubs never got over it: Romney, Will, Kristol, McCain, the Bush family, Kasich, Flake, Corker, Fiona, Sasse, being a few prominent ones; the Never-Trumpers.

The rest fall into the constitutionally ignorant category I mentioned prior.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top