I agree that Sanders was the GOAT. He made the most out of nothing. That line he played behind for years was far from being all-pro. And he was still incredible. And a good guy.
Agreed. Barry is the best to ever carry the rock. His 30 for 30 is awesome too. Every touchdown he ever scored, he carried the ball over to the ref and headed for the bench. Humble as they come. Jim Brown was just bigger and stronger than the players of his era...watch that 30 for 30. Brown would be slow and average today. Barry would dominate in any era... current players agree.
Best I ever saw (as was Reggie), but I wouldn't argue with someone who told me it was Jim Brown. Way before my time, but he was head and shoulders above everyone else in his era.
Don't understand the brown would be average. Would he not develop? Would he not have benefited from science and nutrition?
I'm one of the old f**ts here and I can assure you Jim Brown would be a hall of famer in his era, this era or any era.
I'm don't intend this to be argumentative or something similar, but I'm one of those guys who believe it's a waste of time and energy to try and say who is the best ever...why anyone finds it necessary to say Jim Brown or Barry Sanders is the greatest football player of all time, Michael Jordan or LeBron James is the greatest basketball player of all time, Tiger Woods or Jack Nicklaus is the greatest golfer of all time.
Isn't it enough to simply say, for example, Peyton Manning or Michael Phelps is one of the all-time greats to ever play his respective sport? Do we have to label someone as coming up just a bit short when he/she is still an All-Star amongst All-Stars???
You guys are gonna piss off all the dallas fans who think emmit was the best ever.. I always said, if you put Sanders behind smith's o-line, sanders would own every rushing record there ever was.. you would of never know who smith was...
I'm a lifelog Cowboys fan and I think Barry was the better back.
Posted via VolNation Mobile