Agreed. Barry is the best to ever carry the rock. His 30 for 30 is awesome too. Every touchdown he ever scored, he carried the ball over to the ref and headed for the bench. Humble as they come. Jim Brown was just bigger and stronger than the players of his era...watch that 30 for 30. Brown would be slow and average today. Barry would dominate in any era... current players agree.
I back Sanders myself but it seems silly to diss Smith. At what level did Emmitt Smith not produce like crazy?
HS? He gained nearly 9K yards.
College? C'mon.
Pro? Riigghhht.
I absolutely think Smith benefited from the offense he was in but there's ZERO reason to believe he wouldn't have been considered a top-notch back on any team.
Agreed. Barry is the best to ever carry the rock. His 30 for 30 is awesome too. Every touchdown he ever scored, he carried the ball over to the ref and headed for the bench. Humble as they come. Jim Brown was just bigger and stronger than the players of his era...watch that 30 for 30. Brown would be slow and average today. Barry would dominate in any era... current players agree.
Barry is my favorite running back of all time.....
If Barry had the O-Line that Emmitt had then he would have been untouchable for total rushing yards and TD's in a career. Just my take on it.....
Sayers would be my second and Earl Campbell third.....Earl was a LOAD....
No doubt Emmitt was great, and the Cowboys weren't a championship team without him.Emmitt Smith sat out of the first two regular season game of 1993 and the Cowboys went 0-2. Then Emmitt came back and the Cowboys went on to win the Superbowl. I don't care how good the Cowboys O-line was perceived to be, they were not good without him. That should tell you how good Emmitt was. Best ever imo.
You guys are gonna piss off all the dallas fans who think emmit was the best ever.. I always said, if you put Sanders behind smith's o-line, sanders would own every rushing record there ever was.. you would of never know who smith was...
I grew up as a Dallas fan, back before we had the Titans. I don't necessarily think Emmitt was the greatest, but I also don't thing the gap is as wide as some folk like to think. It's not like just any old scrub would have been as successful as he was.
Most elusive RB for sure (maybe Sayers was a close 2nd). I would have to have Emmitt at the top.
Agreed. Barry is the best to ever carry the rock. His 30 for 30 is awesome too. Every touchdown he ever scored, he carried the ball over to the ref and headed for the bench. Humble as they come. Jim Brown was just bigger and stronger than the players of his era...watch that 30 for 30. Brown would be slow and average today. Barry would dominate in any era... current players agree.
I'm one of the old f**ts here and I can assure you Jim Brown would be a hall of famer in his era, this era or any era.
I'm don't intend this to be argumentative or something similar, but I'm one of those guys who believe it's a waste of time and energy to try and say who is the best ever...why anyone finds it necessary to say Jim Brown or Barry Sanders is the greatest football player of all time, Michael Jordan or LeBron James is the greatest basketball player of all time, Tiger Woods or Jack Nicklaus is the greatest golfer of all time.
Isn't it enough to simply say, for example, Peyton Manning or Michael Phelps is one of the all-time greats to ever play his respective sport? Do we have to label someone as coming up just a bit short when he/she is still an All-Star amongst All-Stars???