misplaced_vol_fan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 66
- Likes
- 0
I disagree. Having conference champs creates opportunities for the weaker, undeserving division. Imagine what a joke it would be if Missouri got in this year. They have no business playing near the title.All of them should.. It's insane not too
lol "Sun division", "Belt division" Good luck trying to get Notre Dame into the Big 10, but for Boise St.'s purposes, the idea of joining the Pac 10 is pretty interesting, but I doubt all Pac 10 teams would get on board with having to travel out to Hawaii every other year.
Here's the real rub.
If you think there's controversy over a 3rd- or possibly 4th-place team "not getting a chance", how on earth would that be rectified? Now the top 4 are happy, but there's 4 or 5 more schools with the same (or better) record who think they deserve to be in that top 4. Open it up to 8 schools, and now you have 8 more that think they should be in. Open it up to 16, and you've got 20 more all saying "They're 8-4 and get in, but we're 10-2 in the MAC and we're not!"
There's 11 conferences, not 12.
Also, here's the problem with having just conference champions. Let's say that Missouri beats Oklahoma later....Missouri is in, Oklahoma out. Should Oklahoma really be left out of a playoff entirely because they didn't win a single arbitrary game that half the conferences don't even have?
if they were going to have auto bids for a playoff, each conference would need to have a championship game in order to recieve that auto-bid in my opinion. Given that condition, then yes, Oklahoma would absolutely deserve to be left out for not winning their conference.
Or just not have conference championships at all, because Missouri deserves nothing, and it is unfair to give them the chance over Texas and even Texas Tech.
Also, the Sun Belt winner shouldn't get any shot at playing for the national title.
How could they complain? Right now, mid majors get no bids, and the major 6 conferences do get bids. A new situation (one that doesn't involve 16 teams) would involve no auto bids for anybody. Doesn't seem like it is hurting anyone.They'd have to have that chance though. For all the talk about how much a football playoff would be like the basketball tournament (part of which is fueled by small conference champions going on a tear), would the NCAA really want to risk not only the segregation of small conferences and also a lawsuit from said conferences?
How could they complain? Right now, mid majors get no bids, and the major 6 conferences do get bids. The new situation would involve no auto bids for anybody. Doesn't seem like it is hurting anyone.
It should be none. And I'd rather have the situation you described than like in 2004 when you would be taking 4 loss Pittsburgh over one loss Texas for the playoff.The 6 major conferences get bowl tie-in bids that simply happen to be major bowls. The BCS itself is essentially a loose confederation of the individual bowls.
If you're talking about having a playoff system, it would have to be all conference champions or none; the problem with none is that there would still be the squawking if a repeat of 2003 happened ("Oklahoma didn't even win their conference! Why should they play for a title?")
The 8th place team deserves no shot at the championship.
I'd say top 4 with no auto bids or just have a plus one.
if they were going to have auto bids for a playoff, each conference would need to have a championship game in order to recieve that auto-bid in my opinion. Given that condition, then yes, Oklahoma would absolutely deserve to be left out for not winning their conference.