Beating of young couple in new Orleans confirmed to be politically motivated.

#77
#77
emainvol said:
Oh yeah, it's so hard for me to grasp that the official report with the victim's statement says absolutely nothing about the attack being politically motivated. You are wrong. Go make a new aluminum foil hat, find some more conspiracy theory blogs and deal.
Click to expand...

You can take your tin foil hat remark and shove it where the sun don't shine.

If the beating wasn't a robbery, what do you say the motivating factor was??

Here is a bit of insight into just who the prostestors were.

The New Orleans Times-Picayune is reporting Allee Bautsch suffered a broken leg and her boyfriend Joe Brown suffered a concussion, a broken jaw and a broken nose in the attack. Bautch required surgery over the weekend with an estimated 2-3 month recovery time.

Not exactly the type of injuries one suffers from a random robbery/mugging.

OTOH, you of the complex liberal mindset claim the Tea Party demonstrations are a threat to peace in the nation.

Consider this:

Tea Party rallies: thousands

Tea Party participants: millions

Tea Party squabbles with Law Enforcement: 0

Tea Parties confronted by riot police: 0

Tea Parties dispersed by tear gas: 0

Tea Party arrests: 0

Tea Parties causing violence/injuries: 0

Tea Parties causing property damage: 0

Tea Parties responsible for the death of anybody: 0
 
#78
#78
gsvol, again with the lack of comprehension. I never argued that they weren't politically motivated. I think it is irrelevant. I was questioning your assertion that it was "confirmed" by your looney blogs and taking issue with the other lies that you posted. If you had bothered to read any of my other posts you probably could have gathered that. I suppose I should know better than to expect anything remotely resembling intelligence and thorough research to come from you.
 
#79
#79
Also, using your standards of proof, the Tea Party absolutely is responsible for property damage. I could find 100 idiot bloggers that say so.
 
#80
#80
gsvol said:
Are you trying to say the attack wasn't politically motivated or say that the NO police are politically corrupt??
Click to expand...

No, I am saying that I doubt the victims said it was politically motivated, mainly because they didn't.

By the way, you should check out what that complex liberal brain of Michelle Malkin came up with regarding this very issue.

And just in case you still think you have a leg to stand on, I direct you here.
 
Last edited:
#81
#81
I believe that we can now all agree that this particular event remains up in the air until we hear otherwise. Confirmed, my ass.
 
#82
#82
emainvol said:
I believe that we can now all agree that this particular event remains up in the air until we hear otherwise. Confirmed, my ass.
Click to expand...


emain, you are of course 100 percent correct that nothing like this has been confirmed. Indeed, according to the two victims, there is simply nothing to support the notion that this has anything to do with their political affiliations.

But this is how these things start -- people posting suspicions and hyperbole somewhere on the net and, before long, its fact.

I was listening to the Schnitt Show the other night while running. He was actually saying that the attackers yelled out at the couple before attacking them and calling them "Republican (insert insult here."

I have not seen a single report that the word Republican was uttered. And yet this fool went on and on about that for a good 20 minutes or so.

The interent is one giant game of telephone, unfortunately made dangerous by the numbskulls of conservative talk radio who make a living blurring the lines between news, commentary, truth, and fiction.
 
#83
#83
"But this is how these things start -- people posting suspicions and hyperbole somewhere on the net and, before long, its fact."

Kind of like stating beck insights violence
 
#84
#84
lawgator1 said:
The interent is one giant game of telephone, unfortunately made dangerous by the numbskulls of conservative talk radio who make a living blurring the lines between news, commentary, truth, and fiction.
Click to expand...

I honestly don't believe I've ever seen you be any more objective than those numbskulls you constantly decry. Your left wing talking point memos are equally egregious in blurring those same lines. Think for yourself every once in a while and make the assumption that people are best served tending to their own affairs and you might actually have an objective idea. I know it sounds crazy, but Joe Sixer doesn't need you nor does he give a shat about what you think.
 
#85
#85
droski said:
"But this is how these things start -- people posting suspicions and hyperbole somewhere on the net and, before long, its fact."

Kind of like stating beck insights violence
Click to expand...

It's a touchy subject. I think that the rhetoric of folks on both sides can turn dangerous, identifying the stuff with that kind of potential is the hard part. Do I think Beck is to blame for any violence to this point? No. Do I think that he, along with countless other pundits are fully capable? Absolutely. Anyone in the public arena with mentally unstable followers (and they all have them) is capable.
 
#86
#86
emainvol said:
It's a touchy subject. I think that the rhetoric of folks on both sides can turn dangerous, identifying the stuff with that kind of potential is the hard part. Do I think Beck is to blame for any violence to this point? No. Do I think that he, along with countless other pundits are fully capable? Absolutely. Anyone in the public arena with mentally unstable followers (and they all have them) is capable.
Click to expand...

but Beck did a piece Saturday that laid out our history along a political continuum that was impressive. Guy is no dummy, but that's why he has been able to use his shtick to whip the loonies into enough of a frenzy to pay him a fortune. I'm sure he decided to take the Coulter approach.
 
#87
#87
BigPapaVol said:
but Beck did a piece Saturday that laid out our history along a political continuum that was impressive. Guy is no dummy, but that's why he has been able to use his shtick to whip the loonies into enough of a frenzy to pay him a fortune. I'm sure he decided to take the Coulter approach.
Click to expand...

We have talked about this quite a bit in my circle. Most of us disagreed with the guy, but thought that he was at least rational for quite a long time. However, even the staunch conservatives that I talk to think he has crossed the line to looney-ville. It was either like you said and planned, or he needs to get back on the meds.
 
#88
#88
emainvol said:
We have talked about this quite a bit in my circle. Most of us disagreed with the guy, but thought that he was at least rational for quite a long time. However, even the staunch conservatives that I talk to think he has crossed the line to looney-ville. It was either like you said and planned, or he needs to get back on the meds.
Click to expand...

after reading the beck article in forbes i've become 100% convinced it's all about making money. he basically admits it.
 
#91
#91
BigPapaVol said:
but Beck did a piece Saturday that laid out our history along a political continuum that was impressive. Guy is no dummy, but that's why he has been able to use his shtick to whip the loonies into enough of a frenzy to pay him a fortune. I'm sure he decided to take the Coulter approach.
Click to expand...


He's got street smarts in terms of striking the chord of fear in the far right. Then again, they've been fairly primed for that by Fox and Limbaugh.

Intellectually speaking, he's really not very impressive at all. In fact, he's rather dim.
 
#92
#92
lawgator1 said:
He's got street smarts in terms of striking the chord of fear in the far right. Then again, they've been fairly primed for that by Fox and Limbaugh.

Intellectually speaking, he's really not very impressive at all. In fact, he's rather dim.
Click to expand...

You obsess over him.......

:eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol:
:lolabove::lolabove::lolabove::lolabove::lolabove::lolabove::lolabove::lolabove::lolabove:
 
#93
#93
lawgator1 said:
He's got street smarts in terms of striking the chord of fear in the far right. Then again, they've been fairly primed for that by Fox and Limbaugh.

Intellectually speaking, he's really not very impressive at all. In fact, he's rather dim.
Click to expand...

Do you know anything about the man?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#94
#94
I'll answer, nothing other than what he sees and hears................

LG is free advertising for Beck.....
 
#95
#95
emainvol said:
gsvol, again with the lack of comprehension. I never argued that they weren't politically motivated. I think it is irrelevant. I was questioning your assertion that it was "confirmed" by your looney blogs and taking issue with the other lies that you posted. If you had bothered to read any of my other posts you probably could have gathered that. I suppose I should know better than to expect anything remotely resembling intelligence and thorough research to come from you.
Click to expand...

Oh well then if you agree the attact was politically motivated, where's the argument?

I based the 'confirmed' on the fact that Allee said they were and the police spokesman confirmed it before he retracted his statement.

I certainly know better than to expect anything remotley resembling intelligenc and thourough research to come from you with your complete denial of the facts in any case.

You probably still maintian that Obama if not illegally, using his position as a US senator interfered by campaigning for a marxist trained, muslim affiliated candidate in Kenya who claimed to be a relative of obama.




emainvol said:
Also, using your standards of proof, the Tea Party absolutely is responsible for property damage. I could find 100 idiot bloggers that say so.
Click to expand...

Do so, I await with baited breath.





emainvol said:
No, I am saying that I doubt the victims said it was politically motivated, mainly because they didn't.

By the way, you should check out what that complex liberal brain of Michelle Malkin came up with regarding this very issue.

And just in case you still think you have a leg to stand on, I direct you here.
Click to expand...


According the the 'hayride' statement a friend of Allee said that is what she was told when she visted the hospital.







emainvol said:
I believe that we can now all agree that this particular event remains up in the air until we hear otherwise. Confirmed, my ass.
Click to expand...


Til then wear your asshat proudly.
 
#96
#96
Why would I agree it was politically motivated with the information that I have seen to this point?

Face it man, you lost this round badly.
 
#97
#97
I'll try to remember that "intelligent research" means "copying and pasting right wing blogs" next time. I prefer to get my news from sources who, I don't know, understand what they are talking about.
 
#98
#98
emainvol said:
Why would I agree it was politically motivated with the information that I have seen to this point?

Face it man, you lost this round badly.
Click to expand...

Under your rules of 'plausable deniability' the McKinley assassination wouln't have been politically mitivated.

emainvol said:
I'll try to remember that "intelligent research" means "copying and pasting right wing blogs" next time. I prefer to get my news from sources who, I don't know, understand what they are talking about.
Click to expand...

The NY Slimes???

You probably still laud the pulitzer prise for Duranty.
 
#100
#100
emain, don't you understand their thoughts process? If they say it over and over again, even if all evidence is to the contrary, they can make it true.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top