Benghazi committee

#51
#51
Odds are, she gets a bump from this. This committee is probably going to have the opposite affect of what the dems are claiming they are using it for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#53
#53
I think it is relevant that Lindenthal's emails are being released because they were being sent / exchanged with HRC. The "release the transcripts since you've released all of his emails" is refusing to see the point. He is relaying information to the SOS, that makes those specific emails relevant. Throw in his personal connection and the type of information he was giving.....how is it that difficult to comprehend?

Sweat Off....Scott Walker or Trey Gowdy?
 
Last edited:
#55
#55
She emails her family that night that it was an al qaeda group, calls foreign leaders to tell them that and then tells the American people it was a YouTube video, then has some guy jailed over the video. Lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#58
#58
Can we burn this witch at the stake yet? Who are we kidding, the anti-christ enjoys fire. Flames would shoot out between her legs in excitement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#60
#60
lawgator1 said:
This thread is not about Benghazi.

This thread is about the Benghazi committee, which was agreed to by Boehner to placate the Tea Party so they could pass the debt ceiling measure. Its about a committee which was created by people who CLAIM they are against government waste, then wasting close to $5 million. Its about a political party so broken, so dysfunctional, that it cannot control its off-the-reservation fringe.
Click to expand...

So this thread isn't to find out what happened it's for you to create partisanship. Got it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#61
#61
lawgator1 said:
This is the eighth committee, the 33rd hearing, and there have been 11 published reports coming form all of that, ALL of it concluding that there was no wrong doing, no ignoring of emergency calls, etc. Defect in the way security requests were handled beforehand? Yes, and those have been addressed. But some sort of malfeasance that night? Zilch to support that claim.

So $4.7 million by this committee alone, which has been sitting for 17 months, longer than any prior select committee, including Watergate. Hmmmmm.

Ask yourself this one question -- and try as hard as it may be -- to be honest. If HRC was not running for President, isn't it a fact that this committee would have been concluded long ago?

You know it is. If you deny that, you are simply lying to yourself.
Click to expand...

Let's be honest then.

State and WH stonewalled information.

Those earlier investigations had several problems:

1) communications were with held
2) State never even acknowledged that they didn't have the emails requested by earlier committees
3) the supposed "objective review" board was hand picked by HC, never interviewed her or several other people with direct knowledge of the events and of course had no access to the emails from the time period.
4) there is a "dark period" of missing emails that coincidentally surround the time of the events in question.
5) we still con't know what HC and the POTUS were doing throughout the duration of the attacks.

There's more but this is off the top of my head.

So if you claim to be honest you have to acknowledge the partisan CYA actions of this administration and HC.

But I suppose you just want to claim it's only one side that is being partisan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 people
#62
#62
It doesn't matter. The left has already won this battle. This only makes the Republicans look bad and HRC a victim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#64
#64
FLVOL69 said:
*
Click to expand...

Watch the headlines tonight and look at the cover pages of any reputable news website tomorrow and we will se who is right.

volinbham said:
It'd be nice if it weren't so partisan but both sides are guilty here.
Click to expand...

Yes, but on the surface the Republicans are way more guilty here. And that's not my personal opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#66
#66
mrorange211 said:
Watch the headlines tonight and look at the cover pages of any reputable news website tomorrow and we will se who is right.



Yes, but on the surface the Republicans are way more guilty here. And that's not my personal opinion.
Click to expand...

You're the one who needs to research the facts, she's guilty and everyone with an ounce of integrity knows it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#67
#67
mrorange211 said:
Yes, but on the surface the Republicans are way more guilty here. And that's not my personal opinion.
Click to expand...

I don't doubt that will be the perception.

Fundamentally though I'd say the real problematic decisions and covering up is on one side. Republicans have overplayed in response to frustration at getting information and for political gain.

Watergate was mentioned earlier. One distinction there was that the GOP actually participated in getting to the truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#68
#68
FLVOL69 said:
You're the one who needs to research the facts, she's guilty and everyone with an ounce of integrity knows it.
Click to expand...

This is hard for you, I understand. I've had to do this many times. It's ok. It's not me, it's you.

This is not my opinion about whether she is guilty or innocent. This is about the court of public opinion, and Clinton has won.

volinbham said:
Watergate was mentioned earlier. One distinction there was that the GOP actually participated in getting to the truth.
Click to expand...

100% agree. This is about the election and she has been successful in characterizing the Reps here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#69
#69
mrorange211 said:
This is hard for you, I understand. I've had to do this many times. It's ok. It's not me, it's you.

This is not my opinion about whether she is guilty or innocent. This is about the court of public opinion, and Clinton has won.



100% agree. This is about the election and she has been successful in characterizing the Reps here.
Click to expand...

No kidding. I wonder when they'll pack it up and say enough is enough. Most people are tired of hearing this crap, and the GOP is only losing credibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#71
#71
Lol. She told her family and foreign leaders it was Al Qaeda but tells the American people at the same time and even the victims families it was the videos fault, and the GOP is losing credibility? Lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#74
#74
lawgator1 said:
I might well vote for Kasich or Bush over her.

But that doesn't mean I can't see what this committee is all about. What a farce!
Click to expand...
I have to remember not to vote for either Kasich or Bush, if there is even a remote possibility that LG will support them.........but he won't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top