Biden Just Announced That He is Out

The point being we're around the middle of the measurement, not incredibly diverse and not incredibly homogeneous.
How are we more diverse than Belgium and Canada?
because we are so diverse that the only way the government can track it is to say someone is: black, white, asian, hispanic, or a few other choices. no one else takes anywhere close to that simplistic of a view.

in belgium you are a minority if you are from France, Holland, Luxembourg, or Germany, who all share a border and a lot of common history, and languages. meanwhile here in the US someone from Canada or Belgium would be part of the majority. the same people from France, Holland, Luxembourg, and Germany that were considered minorities in Belgium, would also be considered part of the homogenous majority here.

every single group that makes those other countries diverse exist here in the US. we are the most common place to find the largest number of whatever group outside of their home country.
 
because we are so diverse that the only way the government can track it is to say someone is: black, white, asian, hispanic, or a few other choices. no one else takes anywhere close to that simplistic of a view.

in belgium you are a minority if you are from France, Holland, Luxembourg, or Germany, who all share a border and a lot of common history, and languages. meanwhile here in the US someone from Canada or Belgium would be part of the majority. the same people from France, Holland, Luxembourg, and Germany that were considered minorities in Belgium, would also be considered part of the homogenous majority here.

every single group that makes those other countries diverse exist here in the US. we are the most common place to find the largest number of whatever group outside of their home country.
Part of this is that the DEI-types that make these policies think whites have no culture and thus are one big blob.
 
Part of this is that the DEI-types that make these policies think whites have no culture and thus are one big blob.

Heck, that is true of all categories. All Africans lumped together as "black", Asian... Asian? Really. Do you know how diverse cultures are in Asia? Hispanic...

Every category is totally based on skin color and not culture. Asian is probably the worse because a Turkish Person, a Iranian, an Indian, a Vietnamese, a Chinese, and a Japanese person are all considered "Asian".
 
because we are so diverse that the only way the government can track it is to say someone is: black, white, asian, hispanic, or a few other choices. no one else takes anywhere close to that simplistic of a view.

in belgium you are a minority if you are from France, Holland, Luxembourg, or Germany, who all share a border and a lot of common history, and languages. meanwhile here in the US someone from Canada or Belgium would be part of the majority. the same people from France, Holland, Luxembourg, and Germany that were considered minorities in Belgium, would also be considered part of the homogenous majority here.

every single group that makes those other countries diverse exist here in the US. we are the most common place to find the largest number of whatever group outside of their home country.
You seem to be implying that everyone in Belgium is from that part of Europea when they're not.
How about Canada?
 
You seem to be implying that everyone in Belgium is from that part of Europea when they're not.
How about Canada?
No that was you incorrectly inferring. I said "IF you are from", not that their only minorities were from Europe.

what about Canada? They list the English, French, Scottish, Irish, German all as minorities too. United States vs. Canada - Country Comparison

like I said, they track their "diversity" far differently than we do.

If they were a US state they would be approx 92% "white" (I have seen ranges of 89-95%)
vs our national average of 72% "white". and people want to consider them "diverse".
 
No that was you incorrectly inferring. I said "IF you are from", not that their only minorities were from Europe.

what about Canada? They list the English, French, Scottish, Irish, German all as minorities too. United States vs. Canada - Country Comparison

like I said, they track their "diversity" far differently than we do.

If they were a US state they would be approx 92% "white" (I have seen ranges of 89-95%)
vs our national average of 72% "white". and people want to consider them "diverse".
All right then but all that doesn't really indicate how we are more diverse.
 
All right then but all that doesn't really indicate how we are more diverse.
Canada being 92% white, and Belgium being AT LEAST 83.7% (they list all other minorities after their top 5 in that other category which constitutes 10% of the total pop) white, doesn't indicate that they are less diverse than a nation that is 72% white?

what are you even considering diversity if its not racial?

our minority population is larger than the total population of both nations COMBINED. with that many more minorities we are going to pull from more nations/races/ethnicities/creeds/languages than those two are, just based on averages.
 
Yes to have different ethnicities in those positions there has to be diversity. But the same level of diversity could exist with one or very few ethnicities reaching high levels.
Do you think diversity and socialism can coexisting the same government? And if so do you have an example of it being successful
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
Canada being 92% white, and Belgium being AT LEAST 83.7% (they list all other minorities after their top 5 in that other category which constitutes 10% of the total pop) white, doesn't indicate that they are less diverse than a nation that is 72% white?

what are you even considering diversity if its not racial?

our minority population is larger than the total population of both nations COMBINED. with that many more minorities we are going to pull from more nations/races/ethnicities/creeds/languages than those two are, just based on averages.
At least that's an answer. There's racial diversity and then there's ethic and also religious diversity. Our minority population being large in numbers doesn't matter; it's the percentages that count.
 
At least that's an answer. There's racial diversity and then there's ethic and also religious diversity. Our minority population being large in numbers doesn't matter; it's the percentages that count.
what you are doing, and that chart did, doesn't make any sense. it uses multiple, different, un-reconciled, methods to determine diversity.

whats more 50% of 10 or 5% of 1000?
Canada has 3.2 million, Belgium has 2 million. we have 92 million minorities.

even still, based on US government math:
US percentage of "diversity" is 28%
Belgium's percentage of "diversity" is at most 17%
Canada's percentage of "diversity" is 8%.

the only way Canada or Belgium, and probably most other nations, look more diverse is if you use their break down of diversity for that nation, vs our version of diversity for ours. using different measurements is going to give you different results. if you apply the same method to all countries the US is going to be far more diverse than your chart gave credit to.

I am willing to bet whatever ethnic or religious diversity exists in those countries exists to a greater number in our country.
 
I'm not sure how, even at this point, that you've yet to subscribe to reason and see that both will be absolute fiscal disasters.

The proof is in the pudding for both, man!
yeah, but they want to see things painted red as it goes down, that will be so much better than if they are painted blue.
 
How will Hunter Biden earn a living now?

And anyone want to get in on a pool on how long until Hunter gets a presidential pardon?

Honestly, I’d drop a couple grand for one of his paintings. I don’t have DNC donor money, but the point is people will continue to buy just for the celeb factor
 

VN Store



Back
Top