luthervol
rational (x) and reasonable (y)
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Messages
- 46,660
- Likes
- 19,738
It's only important if you value the majority over being correct or better.
The government is supposed to provide for the general betterment of the country. I can guarantee you that betterment doesnt look like what you, I, or either party actually wants.
There are any number of examples/stories/anecdotes that point of the frivolous nature of the majority concern. It is by its nature fleeting, contradictory, and self aggrandizing.
Even you, the arbiter of majority, have nothing to provide beyond "even kids do it". They do it because its easiest thing they can grasp. Not because it's good or better than anything else. It's the simplest way to appease the masses while ensuring no real change happens. You even defend it with the lamest of defenses, 'it's what we have always done' bit that offers no context or explanation of why what we are doing is so good or right.
Explain the objective importance of majority rule.
Or the FF knew better and made a system that allowed for the changing of times while not dictating it as emptily as majority rules to leave us to the whims of the masses.What are you saying? That majority should rule?
I’m not an advocate of absolute majority rule, but nobody seems to want to delve into the topic. I will say, though, that a basic understanding of the value of the majority is understood as children by taking straw polls for contended decisions and everyone agreeing to go with the side with the most votes.
That idea extends all the way up to our legislative processes where majorities carry every decision every made. I’m tired of people playing dumb like they don’t understand the importance of the majority.
I think a modest revision to the EC is all that's needed. Divide them up like Maine and Nebraska. Winner of the popular takes the rounding. So that in a state with 3 ECs and the divide is 55/45. The winner gets 2, loser gets 1.
It doesnt equal out the votes, but it's a lot more even. And much more representative.
It’s all I’ve needed thus far. The founding fathers obviously reached consensus or we wouldn’t have the document. And you’ve offered nothing to indicate their consensus applies less today than it did when they formed it.That’s all you’ve got. Let me know when you can form scholarly thoughts on the matter.
Slavery in this country. Maybe, big maybe but not going there. And only if you take the country as a whole during a certain time period. But not slavery in general. Slavery in general is the extension of majority rule. The rule of the majority makes them strong, the voice of the minority makes them a target.The idea developed (or at least refined) in Greece was to let the people govern themselves. This means the majority decides of people make decisions. Now, I understand the inherent flaws in this system for the minority, but minority rule presents the same problems for a society plus some. Minority rule has lead to slavery, centuries long monarchies, authoritarian regimes, genocide, and much more of humanity’s worst features.
Actually no. Majority does rule already. A simple majority of EC votes is already all that is required. Luther was trying to be cute and failed again as usual.Or the FF knew better and made a system that allowed for the changing of times while not dictating it as emptily as majority rules to leave us to the whims of the masses.
Just because it won out as the best option available doesnt inherently mean it was the most popular. I think some of the writings even reflect that. Ben Franklin who was against it even admits to the logic of it in some of his papers. It was the compromise that worked as it was better than the other options.
You are voting for an elector, the same as the people in Montana. In both states the electors are chosen by popular vote so they are equal.
See I told you that you didn't understand the process.
It’s just the usual “we can’t play by the rules and win so we’re gonna change the rules” and boy are they paying for that in spades right now even if Biden does beat TrumpI have honestly given up on trying to explain the whole "united states" part and why we are based on the electoral system.
They know why we have it and it's why they are so upset.
Will you ever be able to undo the knot you have tied yourself into?Nope. That’s like exactly opposite what I was saying with regards to his unanimous point. The ohio kid appreciated the swing and a miss by you though.
Because majority of EC votes already does rule.
The idea developed (or at least refined) in Greece was to let the people govern themselves. This means the majority decides of people make decisions. Now, I understand the inherent flaws in this system for the minority, but minority rule presents the same problems for a society plus some. Minority rule has lead to slavery, centuries long monarchies, authoritarian regimes, genocide, and much more of humanity’s worst features.