Blueprint..

#51
#51
It tells me you were watching a different game or know nothing about football. Nobody that I’ve seen or heard thinks our OLine handled anything. Except you. They were horrible. What does that tell you when you are the only person saying that?

Reading comp. Is. Important.

Tell your family. Tell your friends. Don't end up like Delmar.
 
#52
#52
Unless those less talented teams have an interior DL and big corners who can press and hang with our speed, it doesn't matter what they try. This scheme only works with talent to win 1-on-1 battles. No one else til the post-season will be able to do so.
For us, I didn't see this as a problem after handling LSU, Bama, and UF, and UK. Was a surprise to struggle to that extent on the OL. We can kinda scheme around their heavy blitz, but unless we can play our game offensively, I don't see our defense holding them to 6 pts in 7 possessions to end the game again.
They took absolutely no chances on offense in the second half. That's how much confidence Kirby had in shutting down what we were doing down. They won the one on one matchups on the islands. That is surprising. I think Hyatt and Tillman were less than 100 percent though. I know Tillman was. Small is a big part of this offense and he went out. That sucked.
 
#53
#53
Nobody left on our regular season schedule has the horses on the back end to do what UGA did. We may see a lot more blitzing but that'll just be people choosing to go down swinging but they are still going down.
 
#54
#54
Ill tell you what wouldve helped mightly. A STUD running back. Big, strong, fast. I love our guys and their toughness, but they simply lack talent to be difference makers against teams as talented as UGA. A strong run game takes all the heat off Hooker and opens up play action.
 
#55
#55
Reading comp. Is. Important.

Tell your family. Tell your friends. Don't end up like Delmar.
Let’s see now Einstein. You said Hooker had a clean pocket most of the time and our O line handled the blitz well. Did I read that correctly? Again, you are literally the only person I’ve seen that has said that. Their nose guard, Carter, looked like he had a permanent reservation in our backfield. Looks like everyone else saw Hooker under constant pressure and that the O line was awful and all you’ve got is cute little internet cliches. Last response to this junk. I never get into a battle of wits with an unarmed man.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vawleyes
#56
#56
Let’s see now Einstein. You said Hooker had a clean pocket most of the time and our O line handled the blitz well. Did I read that correctly? Again, you are literally the only person I’ve seen that has said that. Their nose guard, Carter, looked like he had a permanent reservation in our backfield. Looks like everyone else saw Hooker under constant pressure and that the O line was awful and all you’ve got is cute little internet cliches. Last response to this junk. I never get into a battle of wits with an unarmed man.

You did not read that correctly. There was a very important distinction I made that you've repeatedly ignored or haven't understood.
 
#57
#57
If we had executed our game plan against Georgia we may have won. But we didn’t. Against their superior talent, we had to execute Almost perfectly. We didn’t even hit 50% of the plays we needed to win. So credit to UGA but we didn’t do ourselves any favors.
 

VN Store



Back
Top