Whoa there, sport. You need to read what I said a little more closely.
I said a case could be made for UT, just that I wouldn't like it -- and for the very reasons you point out in your post that happened to UT. I don't think its fair to lose and therefore "avoid" the opportunity to get knocked out of contention at the very end. Its sort of a strength of scheduling thing to me -- WVa. and L'ville avoid playing tough games and end up rewarded for it.
Yes, but you play Arkansas and so it could not be the case that both UT and Arkansas are one loss teams at end of season. If Arkansas wins out then by definition two things happen. First, UT is at least a two-loss team and so the discussion of a BCS bid for you is over. Second, Arkansas is in the SEC title game and Auburn is not and then it is Arkansas that can complain that, if they lose the SEC title game, then they might get passed over for BCS spot by Auburn even though Arky beat them.
Your best case scenario is of course that UF loses and you win out and represent the SECE. But assuming that does not happen, your best chance is for the SECW representative to have two losses. If so, and if UF wins, then the second place SEC team is probably viewed as UT and you get the at large birth. If the SECW team wins and gets the automatic birth, then you are in a bette rposition to jump over Florida in the BCS because Florida will have lost to a two-loss team, hurting their SOS and also giving them one additional loss.
Know what, as I map this out, your best bet is to win out, beating Arky in the process and have Auburn lose, as well. That way, Arky still wins SECW, but now you are competing against only one other one-loss team: UF. Then I'd give you a great shot at a BCS at-large birth, regardless of who wins the SEC title game.
Make sense?