She might be good, but in my opinion, people with great personal skill and accomplishment often don't have the ability to transfer their skills to others. Their success usually comes easy to them and they can't understand why others can't do the same thing. Whereas the failures are more intent on seeing what needs to be done to be a better player, and are empathetic toward those who are struggling.
Players today need to be taught how to dribble the ball, not make behind the back no look passes.
Certainly, there are great players who became great coaches, but that's not universally true. I'll bet non players or mediocre players on average, make better coaches than skilled athletes. First, their interest is in coaching, not playing. Look at Scott Rueck, Billy Beane of Moneyball fame, even Geno. None were great athletes.
I guess what I'm saying is great athletes have a leg up when it comes to getting coaching jobs. But their skill is not what makes a great coach.
Gordon could turn out to be good for the program. But, I don't see much to indicate she will succeed. The last thing the LVs needed was to hire the Head Coaches friend as assistant. That's what PaT did in recommending Holly.
I would have gone with a young, smart, person who is a student of coaching, an offense wiz kid, a disciplinarian. What Holly hired is more of the same, a member of a failing club. But that's apparently ok, she's a LVFL.