Well, only because you explicitly asked. As I quoted,
It was not true that you didn't understand the point of the person you responded to who had mocked (in blue font) the idea that "Heupel can’t develop players."
There was no reason for you to disagree with that post and no reason for you to deny that Heupel develops talent when everyone knows that a general claim that Heupel develops talent refers by extension to the Heupel's staff in that context. But you:
That was a "set up" to get people to correct you, so you could troll them. And as I said (above) it was not true that you didn't understand what people meant. And then after playing with your food for a bit, you made a petty (in the context) distinction and said that what you meant was that CRG developed him.
The whole thing was pointless. And, more to my point, you found a way to attack or deny the notion that Heupel develops talent -- on the side, as it were. That's what I mean by looking for a negative angle to positive news or posts.
You even found a way to drag Pruitt into it!
No one wants to hear that. And you know it.
Compare simply, "Heupel does, and give Rodney Garner big credit on this one." Or simply, "Rodney Garner deserves big credit on this one."
And I'm not being a smart aleck. Think about it. You might not realize you do this. Sorry, so long but I was trying to answer you in earnest. I apologize to everyone else for the detail. This is a minor example, granted; but for that reason, I think it's the most instructive.
By the way,
is a classic troll maneuver to omit everything pertinent that you said and that I just brought to light for you. I'm not calling you a troll. I'm saying your denial there is textbook Troll 101.
