rekinhavoc
Respect the Hemi! No Interviews.
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2007
- Messages
- 16,516
- Likes
- 31,989
Are boosters going to start making money off of NIL deals? They are paying for players likeness but I don't see the return that generates. Are donors going to start making money off Tennessee football operations revenue in return for paying for their roster?
Boosters giving someone a car for them doing a commerical later is one thing. The NIL is setting it up where college football programs will have to actively manage a salary for a football program. This is big money over an extended period of time, not just a one time payment or a house.Have boosters ever gotten a return for the money they give players? They might actually see some in the form of social media advertising done by the players they pay now. More chance of an ROI now than before NIL.
I disagree. Even at the high D1 level, only a small handful of recruits will get big (or any) NIL deals as a recruit. Mid levels will still recruit the same kids they’ve always gotten and will compete exactly as they’ve been doing.Stay strapped or get clapped. In all seriousness I think NIL will keep mid majors from competing as much.
The way the contract was explained, he basically sold away all of his NiL rights to "the collective" for 4 years. So if he goes somewhere else, he'll get paid $0 in NiL in future years...that would easily be a million+ dollar punishment on his behalf.110%
kids gonna take his visits. this one hasn't even started yet
I hope we Texas A&M the sh*t out of this class.Im tired of losing to the big boys and having to hear about it all the time.
That actually makes sense. So he can’t use another NIL collective or do his own thing as that collective owns his name image and likeliness.The way the contract was explained, he basically sold away all of his NiL rights to "the collective" for 4 years. So if he goes somewhere else, he'll get paid $0 in NiL in future years...that would easily be a million+ dollar punishment on his behalf.
I think it's actually quite the smart way to go about it. We basically bought a $350k option on him. Which, to Spyre, is peanuts at this point.
Never saw the 30 for 30 on SMU, huh? That's exactly what the football program and boosters were doing--managing long term salaries for the players. (By extension, you can assume it's been happening at most succesful programs ever since.)Boosters giving someone a car for them doing a commerical later is one thing. The NIL is setting it up where college football programs will have to actively manage a salary for a football program. This is big money over an extended period of time, not just a one time payment or a house.
No one, that ive seen has shown anything other than rampant speculationThat actually makes sense. So he can’t use another NIL collective or do his own thing as that collective owns his name image and likeliness.
So he signs somewhere else they don’t do any work for him and he makes $0 after the guaranteed money.
This is absurd. Dude he’s still a national championship winning head coach. You can hate Georgia and still give credit. There are like 5 active coaches who can say that. If you can recruit at such a high level that you can beat coaches that are smarter at X’s and O’s than you, that’s still elite in its own right. I hate that bowl cut doofus, but to sit at your keyboard calling him overrated while they just won the Natty is so stupid.Exactly, he’s far from elite people are so quick to throw words out.
Great way to manage the portal as well. lolThe way the contract was explained, he basically sold away all of his NiL rights to "the collective" for 4 years. So if he goes somewhere else, he'll get paid $0 in NiL in future years...that would easily be a million+ dollar punishment on his behalf.
I think it's actually quite the smart way to go about it. We basically bought a $350k option on him. Which, to Spyre, is peanuts at this point.
The question is, what conditions are on the non-guaranteed money if it's not tied to him being at UT? And can those conditions be met elsewhere, so that UT's collective ends up still paying him to perform at another school?That actually makes sense. So he can’t use another NIL collective or do his own thing as that collective owns his name image and likeliness.
So he signs somewhere else they don’t do any work for him and he makes $0 after the guaranteed money.
I know there's a lot of rich people out there, but I don't see boosters supporting a 30M+ a year cost with no upside of return. That's not sustainable.Never saw the 30 for 30 on SMU, huh? That's exactly what the football program and boosters were doing--managing long term salaries for the players. (By extension, you can assume it's been happening at most succesful programs ever since.)
Now, it's above board and legal.