California supreme is review gay marriage law

[VOLatile]

This last sentence discredits not only this post but anything and everything you have to say in future discussions.

I really doubt that. My posts have more common sense in them the crap that was posted before me.

 

[JTrainDavis]

I really doubt that. My posts have more common sense in them the crap that was posted before me.

So you said that my views on the topic are due to my brainwashing by my church, which in itself has no stance for or against wedding homos. So how have i been brainwashed into my opinion when i have no weekly guidance from the pulpit as to how i should think?

 

[MontereyVol]

I really doubt that. My posts have more common sense in them the crap that was posted before me.

I thought I was being funny?

 

[VOLatile]

So you said that my views on the topic are due to my brainwashing by my church, which in itself has no stance for or against wedding homos. So how have i been brainwashed into my opinion when i have no weekly guidance from the pulpit as to how i should think?

I thought I was being funny?

I got two threads mixed up. I was mostly referring to the gay superhero thread where people were more serious about this matter. My apologies.

 

[BigPapaVol]

I really doubt that. My posts have more common sense in them the crap that was posted before me.

I'm not sure I can agree with the premise here, but I am certain English takes a beating in your posts.

 

[therealUT]

Honestly, I hope they overturn it. I don't believe it should be left to the people to make the rules as to who can marry who. There shouldn't be rules.

I really doubt that. My posts have more common sense in them the crap that was posted before me.

Common sense and logical thought processes, right?

If you want the government to sanction marriages, then there must be rules. That, good fellow, is purely rational.

 

[milohimself]

I don't get why so many people disagree on the issue...

IMO marriage is an institution of the church, and if a church wants to marry a man and a martian then they can. The government ought to have no such reign over a church. However, what I AM for is for any two people, be they same sex or not, to be allowed to the same tax benefits, etc. as anybody else.

 

[VOLatile]

I don't get why so many people disagree on the issue...

IMO marriage is an institution of the church, and if a church wants to marry a man and a martian then they can. The government ought to have no such reign over a church. However, what I AM for is for any two people, be they same sex or not, to be allowed to the same tax benefits, etc. as anybody else.

Thanks for saying so elegantly the words that I couldn't find. I agree wholeheartedly with you.

And might I add for the rest of you, I almost always use proper grammar and my thought processes are fine.

 

[KB5252]

I don't get why so many people disagree on the issue...

IMO marriage is an institution of the church, and if a church wants to marry a man and a martian then they can. The government ought to have no such reign over a church. However, what I AM for is for any two people, be they same sex or not, to be allowed to the same tax benefits, etc. as anybody else.

Agreed.

 

[joevol320]

Did you seriously just ask me that? I'm talking about sex-wise. Men can marry women, women can marry women, and men can marry men. How does it affect you? It doesn't. You've all just been brainwashed by the church.

what's the difference? you're the brainwashed sheep.