85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 32,424
- Likes
- 63,606
Don’t care if they confessed.
Don’t care if you have witnesses.
Don’t care about the airtight forensics.
We get it wrong. We cannot afford to get it wrong.
From a purely philosophical standpoint, I don’t have a problem with the death penalty. If a society so chooses.I know the line will get fuzzy.. but let's say they caught the Nashville shooter alive. We know she or he ( I can't keep up... ) killed all those innocent people. You'd rather pay to keep them alive?
From a purely philosophical standpoint, I don’t have a problem with the death penalty. If a society so chooses.
I have a problem with our application of the death penalty. We get it wrong.
False witness is as old as man.
False confession is as old as man.
And law enforcement is fallible.
Are you proposing some version of a “super-burden” of proof for capital punishment? Beyond all doubt?
I concede that some instances remove all doubt, but what about the others?
I understand your position.Figuring out the threshold would be touchy.. but if there’s a video of a person shooting children then hang ‘em. If there’s the slightest doubt in the world then it’s a no go for me.
I understand your position.
That “man” filmed himself raping that 8 year old girl. Then he filmed himself, smiling for the camera and narrating, while he gutted her like a fish.
There is clear surveillance video of him abducting her.
Her fibers and DNA are all over his van.
His DNA profile is present, in multiple forms, with the victim.
He recorded and narrated the crimes.
And they were unable to recover the body until he told them where.
Is there any doubt there ^? Doesn’t look like it. But how often will you get all of that?
And at the end of the day it’s still people, just people, that will be tasked with pulling all that evidence together.
And people make mistakes.