Well, in non-mop-up duty, during the 4 preseason scrimmages while he was with Cologne, Clausen was 17-of-19 for 185 yards and 1 TD. Including his stats from the regular season, he's been 23-of-32 (71.9%) for 264 yards and 3 TDs (no ints).
Even in regular NFLEL games, of Clausen's 5 possessions, the Admirals punted only once, scored 2 TDs and 1 FG, and ran out the final 5 minutes of the game... with Clausen directing the victory formation at the opponent's 29-yard line.
In 2 NFL preseason games (Kansas City) last season he was 12-of-18 for 97 yards.
His total professional statistics are 35-of-50 (70%) for 361 yards and 3 TDs.
He has performed quite adequately when given the oppty in game situations. There is more politics to football than we'll ever know... but Kittner was in camp with the Admirals during preseason and played in all 10 games. Kittner has NFL starting experience. For all intents and purposes, Clausen is still a rookie. Clausen gets a tough break and is reallocated by the league AFTER preseason. He was sent to the Admirals in a no-win situation. They already had 2 NFL quarterbacks fighting it out for the starting position. So basically he went from front runner to start in Cologne, to not even active on the Admirals roster?
The league was responsible for the reallocation, because I know Coach Vaas and all his praise for Clausen would not have dealt Clausen and kept some Japanese quarterback. BTW - Namiki was 1-of-8 for 19 yards and 2 ints on the season for Cologne. How the league makes such decisions, I don't know. Cologne had 4 qbs and Amsterdam had only 2... so the match is obvious. The choice of personnel?