CBS urged to scrap Super Bowl ad with Tebow, mom

#51
#51
She would not have had the abortion there. She could have come back home to have it.
The people that do not want this ad shown, are really pathetic with this shat.
 
#56
#56
hmanvolfan said:
Of course, but who's fighting to censor? Free speech is in there, right?
Click to expand...

CBS owns that block of time and they can choose how they want to spend it. If your free speech argument were valid any joe could get his ad in there and CBS would have to run it.
 
#57
#57
T-TownVol said:
She would not have had the abortion there. She could have come back home to have it.
The people that do not want this ad shown, are really pathetic with this shat.
Click to expand...

You don't know if that's what they recommended. I don't see that as being probable.

In which country was he born?
 
Last edited:
#60
#60
T-TownVol said:
That is whole point now isn't it.
Click to expand...

I'm not the one claiming to know, just saying that IMO her story sounds very unlikely. Its too far-fetched for me to believe that a doctor over there would not only recommend something illegal but also suggest she return home to do it.
 
#61
#61
The Dude said:
I'm not the one claiming to know, just saying that IMO her story sounds very unlikely. Its too far-fetched for me to believe that a doctor over there would not only recommend something illegal but also suggest she return home to do it.
Click to expand...

The "return home" part is just common sense if she had a medical issue that would suggest an abortion.

The point is. Alred is making this crap up to try and discredit the family just because she does not like the message.

It really does not matter what you or I think about it being "far-fetched".
 
#62
#62
Her ability to have, or not to have an abortion in the Philippines, is irrelevant to the ad.
 
#63
#63
T-TownVol said:
The "return home" part is just common sense if she had a medical issue that would suggest an abortion.

The point is. Alred is making this crap up to try and discredit the family just because she does not like the message.

It really does not matter what you or I think about it being "far-fetched".
Click to expand...

Its not common sense that a physician would put his livelihood in jeopardy and recommend that, sorry.

She didn't make anything up. Just googled the article and the title says "..May Be Based On Falsehood". She too questions them in the article, and there's nothing wrong with that.

If her story is dishonest, it should be exposed. There's no problem with them announcing their faith in God, but it seems to me like they're trying to discredit the specific prenatal medicine by saying "see, science was wrong". If that's the case, you better have your facts straight, like what the doctor truly suggested for a detached placenta in a country where abortions are illegal.
 
#66
#66
Snakes on a Wii said:
Yes, it is. It directly reflects the falsity of the story and undermines the whole premise of the ad.
Click to expand...

And no, it is not relevant. She could have been told she need an abortion, but was not able to do it in that country. For a scientific mind such as yours, I would think you could look at all the angles involved, and make a better decision, instead of just believing what you are told to believe.

Don't you think the American public can make their own mind up on this, instead of taking the pro abortion rights words for it? Or yours for that matter?

I highly doubt you, or anyone else here knows her specific case, and what she was told, or not told.
 
Last edited:
#67
#67
BeecherVol said:
And no, it is not relevant. She could have been told she need an abortion, but was not able to do it in that country. For a scientific mind such as yours, I would think you could look at all the angles involved, and make a better decision, instead of just believing what you are told to believe.

Don't you think the American public can make their own mind up on this, instead of taking the pro abortion rights words for it? Or yours for that matter?

I highly doubt you, or anyone else here knows her specific case, and what she was told, or not told.
Click to expand...

You are right we don't know the specifics to the case so why get angry if we choose to side with the side you are not on? After all, you are just taking Mrs. Tebows word for it.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top