firestorm
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2011
- Messages
- 22,132
- Likes
- 8,902
I'm sure these were "random" picks, but how do you not put Tennessee on that list of 25?! Really!!??
College Football Playoff Scenarios
Not an excuse but selling reality
We are extremely young and inexperienced on both lines. Doesn't bold well for the long haul. That's without losing someone to injuries. Throw that in and we might not see 5 wins
Yes
People expecting the moon and only getting a paper plate will be the ones yelling and screaming the most at the end of the season
As much as I hate losing, I am willing to give Jones time as long as improvement continued on the field and he continues to recruit lights out
When the game is on I'll be full homer as usual but I'm done with the pie in the sky off season crap. CBJ is a good coach but again we have issue and we still play in the toughest conference in the land. We shall see but the whole team has to improve. I saw skill player issues last year more so than line issues. Could be reversed this year.
I get tired of so called Vol fans putting Coach Fulmer down. He produced winner after, one being a national championship. Several Eastern championships. Also conference championships. I would like someone to explain what has happened since . I do think Coach Jones will turn it around. But quit dragging Coach Fulmer through the quagmire, he done lots for UT and he is a Vol through and through. What did Dooley and that piece of crap that is at Alabama do. O O .
As of right now I wont say BJ is or isn't the man for the job. He has to show improvement this year and have a upset or 2 but I think Jones liability is Jancek. I think by the end of the year Jones will have to make a decision on a couple of his coaches and if not Jones wont make it to year 4. Our Def. was horrible and I don't see it getting better because I don't think Jancek is even a decent DC.
Pundits and fans NEVER, EVER pick teams to break out. They ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS.....predict based on the previous year. Nobody expected Auburn to even challenge for the SEC W in 2010 or last year, but they won their division. Nobody, but nobody picked Mizzou to win the SEC E last year.
So, predictions are like bungholes...everyone has one, and it usually full of worthless crap. It doesn't take any special insight to predict based on what happened last year.
I expect 6-8 wins... not the moon. That is VERY consistent with your expectation of continuing improvement on the field.
Question though... what improvement on the field are you talking about continuing? I saw mostly treading water at the same level as Dooley's failure last fall. What can you point to at the end of the season that says, "This team has really improved over the course of the season... they've really been coached up"?
Where did I ever suggest that? But ftr, I only care about whether the UT HC can coach players up... I'd just as soon other programs didn't.The coaching up standard only applies to butch,huh?
I would say there's some reason for concern. I'm holding out hope and believe he CAN coach. But I can't buy in completely. The coaching didn't look good last year. In fact, it didn't look any better than the previous 3 years on the field. Most here want to blame the players... it wasn't all the players. My HOPE is that it was part of his rebuilding strategy and not an indication of a lack of ability.There are some sites already suggesting that butch can't coach.
They do give him credit for his recruiting. I would rather have a recruiter because there is no evidence that anyone wins the sec without players. I tend to look at the nfl draft instead of rivals, by the way as the proof is in the pudding.
I've gone back and forth but want to see if things improve with the new philosophy on the DL. I would agree that the D looked poorly coached last fall beyond anything that others excuse as "lack of speed/talent". It doesn't take tremendous speed to at least look like you know what "in position" means.
I am as big of a fan as I've met, but I understand why people say we suck. Because we have lived through the worst era in UT football history.
What bothers me is that the national guys act like getting 32 highly touted kids is insignificant to this season. You hear things like "you don't win with freshmen, they're inexperienced on the OLine" etc.
My argument is that even in the last 10 years, heck maybe even 5, freshmen have changed. These kids have camps, private coaches, nutrition plans, more gyms are available at low prices etc. They're coming in and they're about as prepared as we've seen freshmen be.
Now that's not to say that we'll win 10 games, but nobody is expecting that. But why is 7 wins looked at as impossible by the national media? Because they're not in touch with every program.
I'll say it again, 7 wins is what I'm expecting. I'm hoping for 8, and I honestly don't think it's that crazy of a stretch.
Last year who would have picked us to beat a superior SC team? Or to take Georgia within an inch of another upset?
Now you infuse the team with more talent, although less experienced. And I say we're a better team. If Butch and company could coach up those guys from last year, I expect the same this year.
You have 6 games on the schedule that you're going to be the favorite in. Find one upset and bam there's 7 games.
Last year we had experienced OLine and DLine and still sucked so the theory that "no returning starters on either lines" is flawed. These kids have played, just not started a lot. And we got an upgrade at skill positions.
QB-better this year
RB-better this year
WR-better this year
TE-better this year
OL-not as talented, but we'll see if they can perform better since they fit this system better.
DL-taking a step back
LB-more athletic, a little better this year
DB-better this year
K-worse this year
P-worse this year
KR-better this year
PR-slightly better this year.