change?

#26
#26
According to you, I suppose I'm not a real American then.:)


Of course, my life has never nor will never be lived by values defined by you.
Do I think you are a real American? Yes.

Do I think you appreciate the values and ideas that made this nation great? No.

Do I think people of your ideological ilk will cause this nation to fail? Yes.

I suppose a majority of this country aren't real Americans either.
The majority of people in this country are sheep.
 
#27
#27
Look, I am not going to argue with any of you as to who is a real American is and who isn't.
 
#29
#29
Look, I am not going to argue with any of you as to who is a real American is and who isn't.

...but truefan, that takes all the fun out of being a godless; communist; marxist; socialistic miscreant. :)
 
#33
#33
I can't imagine she wouldn't accept the position, but there always seems to be some sort of hidden motive in her actions.

If you don't believe every move she makes is highly calculated from a political standpoint then I don't know what to tell you. Even the Clinton's closest friends acknowledge they both are political beasts.
 
#35
#35
That whole Marc Rich thing stinks to high heaven. I'm surprised Count Baracula would start with someone with such a known issue.
 
#37
#37
That whole Marc Rich thing stinks to high heaven. I'm surprised Count Baracula would start with someone with such a known issue.

He has a laundry list of issues, but I've been suprised by a lot of the O's choices so far.
 
#43
#43
Do you ever read anything but right wing rhetoric?


Sorry, if I might interject, I don't get the "New York Times" and I don't own a copy of Chairman Mao's Little Red Book either. Those are the very foundations for Leftist thinking aren't they?

This change in Washington is looking more and more like the same, old, blundering, tired, very rich, socialististic, limber lipped, bleary-eyed, feel your pain, Democratic Party chronies that gave the White House back to the Republicans about 8 years ago.
 
#44
#44
he picks hillary as the sec of state, he has many clintonites on his staff. i guess the only change we'll get is that we'll have our taxes raised higher than clinton did. what a joke

i know its awesome isnt it? you know whats more ridiculous than you as a person and this thread? the fact that people like you and your ilk actually believe these last 8 years were fine!!! what some backward idiot f**ktard neo conservative ruins this country in 8 years, spends more than any spendocrat, didnt do sh*t for the economy, gets american boys killed in the wrong war and you want to elect his sidekick??? gimme a break you blinkered sheep of an excuse of a man!!!
 
#47
#47
I wonder how many people in this thread, who are complaining about Clinton, think W. Bush's Adminisration was better then Clinton's Administration?
 
#48
#48
I wonder how many people in this thread, who are complaining about Clinton, think W. Bush's Adminisration was better then Clinton's Administration?

Colin Powell/Condi Rice >> Warren Christopher/Madelaine Albright

I won't say that, top to bottom, W's is/was better than Clinton's since every administration has it's duds.

but, oklavol, you have to at least be wondering about Obama tapping a bunch of former Clintonites for his cabinet. His one surprising pick thus far has been Geithner for Treasury. His pick of ret. Marine General Jim Jones as National Security Advisor is being seen as a good sign as well.
 
Last edited:
#49
#49
I wonder how many people in this thread, who are complaining about Clinton, think W. Bush's Adminisration was better then Clinton's Administration?

Not the point. Obama campaigned on "change" and selects Clnton as SOS. Where is this "change" all the Obamaites were frothing at the mouth about?
 
#50
#50
Not the point. Obama campaigned on "change" and selects Clnton as SOS. Where is this "change" all the Obamaites were frothing at the mouth about?

the tiger striped velvet drapes Michelle has picked out for the executive bathroom is all the change we're likely to see.
 

VN Store



Back
Top