Orange_Vol1321
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2012
- Messages
- 27,961
- Likes
- 41,593
lolololol.Jeez you ramble worse than I do.
Still, you acknowledge that China is building more hydro, nuclear, etc. than we are, then you go right back to saying they are “doing nothing”. Then you want to scapegoat India?! We still emit more than twice as much as they do, total, and nearly 10x as much per capita. I’m curious, if their per capita emissions never surpass ours, will you still feel they’ve done nothing? And then you move on to blame “my friends" the extreme environmentalists? It sure seems like you just want to blame everyone else and take no responsibility yourself.
And you still haven’t made the connection as to why the Paris Agreement is bad for us. You’ve claimed that we’re meeting our (voluntary!) commitment already anyway. Is the economy in shambles? No? Ok, so what would be the difference if Trump hadn’t announced we will withdraw? The only difference would be that our diplomats in Poland could be negotiating from a position of strength. Now they’re just twitting their thumbs while the rest of the world hashes out the rulebook for implementing the Paris Agreement.
And the demonstrations in France are about much more than a few cents diesel tax, as I’m sure you know. The French support climate action. The takeaway on climate policy, if any, is don’t make your carbon tax regressive.
Climate models published since 1973 have generally been quite skillful in projecting future warming. While some were too low and some too high, they all show outcomes reasonably close to what has actually occurred, especially when discrepancies between predicted and actual CO2 concentrations and other climate forcings are taken into account.
Models are far from perfect and will continue to be improved over time. They also show a fairly large range of future warming that cannot easily be narrowed using just the changes in climate that we have observed.
Nevertheless, the close match between projected and observed warming since 1970 suggests that estimates of future warming may prove similarly accurate.
Heres my problem with climate change. When you watch the local weather at night they have the record lows and highs for that day. You will see record high being "insert number" and it show the date as 1891.Let’s see how quickly that is buried by the Global Warming folks
Heres my problem with climate change. When you watch the local weather at night they have the record lows and highs for that day. You will see record high being "insert number" and it show the date as 1891.
There was no cars, there was no factories. This tells you that weather moves up and down every so many years.