Perspective
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2017
- Messages
- 374
- Likes
- 262
I think it’s alluded to in his post. #2 is an OC, and some with influence wanted other HCs to at least be truly considered.But the other day you said there were two top candidates and if #1 said no, then the fallback would get the offer and say yes. So now you’re saying there was the big guy at 1 and he said no, so we met with 3 others today? I’m not calling you out or anything, but I’m confused as to what happened to candidate #2? And if Elliott was #2, then you’re telling me that DW is that inept that he didn’t have a 3rd or 4th option? Which at this point I’m not sure I’m buying this because everyone and their mother says DW is not inept. I also find it hard to believe that his #2 was Elliott. That doesn’t fit any pattern in terms of what public comments have been made by both him and the leadership.
These things are always fluid unless it’s a completely authoritarian AD that answers to no one