Coaching Idea to SAVE Tennessee Football

#126
#126
Maybe he’ll take the job if we ask him nicely. After all, he owns property in Tennessee and his wife was a UT cheerleader…
 
#127
#127
A co coach would add lots of checks and balances. We would have 3 people calling plays on offense if this year is the meta. Would love to see Heupel and Gruden high fiving before running the T and skipping like girls to the sideline holding hands!
 
#129
#129
Hairy Vols said:
Here's why adding Jon Gruden as a co-head coach alongside Josh Heupel could be a groundbreaking move for the Tennessee Vols.. let me know what you guys think….

1. Combining Elite Experience with Innovation​

  • Gruden’s NFL Pedigree: Jon Gruden is a Super Bowl-winning coach with decades of NFL experience. He has an extensive knowledge of pro-style offenses and knows how to develop players for the next level. Pairing him with Heupel’s innovative, fast-paced college offense would create a dynamic coaching duo that merges professional-level strategy with cutting-edge college tactics.
  • Heupel’s Offensive Genius: Josh Heupel is known for his explosive offensive schemes, but sometimes struggles on defense and in situational play-calling. Gruden could complement Heupel by bringing a more balanced, pro-style approach that focuses on game management, defense, and adjusting to tough SEC competition. Together, they’d make a more well-rounded staff that covers both innovation and experience.

2. Revolutionary in College Football​

  • First-Ever Co-Head Coaches: College football has never seen a true co-head coaching structure, and Tennessee could pioneer this approach. Imagine the recruitment and media attention this groundbreaking move would generate. Bringing in Gruden as co-head coach would make headlines across the nation and put Tennessee at the forefront of football innovation. This unique leadership duo would offer something no other program can.
  • Specialized Leadership: Heupel could focus on the offense and player development, while Gruden handles the defense, game management, and team discipline. This split would allow each coach to focus on their strengths, making the team stronger as a whole. Gruden's intense personality would give the Vols the edge in preparation and game-day adjustments.

3. Recruiting Powerhouse​

  • NFL Connection: Gruden’s NFL resume would be a massive draw for recruits looking to go pro. Players would see the direct pipeline to the NFL under his mentorship, while still benefiting from Heupel’s offensive-minded system. Imagine the appeal of a program where recruits are learning from a former NFL head coach and an offensive innovator.
  • Reinvigorating Tennessee's Image: Tennessee needs a jolt to return to its glory days, and this co-head coach idea could be just the thing to revitalize the program. The media buzz and recruiting hype from having two high-profile coaches would put Tennessee back on the map and bring excitement back to Neyland Stadium.

4. Solving the Vols’ Current Struggles​

  • Defensive Focus: Gruden would bring an NFL-level understanding of defense and player discipline, areas where Tennessee has been inconsistent under Heupel. By sharing head coach duties, Gruden could handle defense and tough, in-game decision-making, while Heupel keeps his focus on crafting explosive offensive plays.
  • Balancing Game Management: While Heupel has shown brilliance in offensive schemes, his game management and defensive oversight have left room for improvement. Gruden's experience in managing every aspect of a football team could help guide the Vols in tighter, more strategic ways, especially in high-pressure SEC games.

Conclusion: A Revolutionary Move​

This co-head coach structure would not only be a first in college football but could set a new standard for elite programs looking to maximize their coaching potential. By adding Jon Gruden’s experience and intensity to Josh Heupel’s offensive genius, Tennessee would create a dual-threat leadership team unlike anything ever seen. This bold, forward-thinking move could bring the Vols back to national prominence.
Click to expand...
Someone doesn’t like family time at Christmas….
 
#131
#131
Hairy Vols said:
Here's why adding Jon Gruden as a co-head coach alongside Josh Heupel could be a groundbreaking move for the Tennessee Vols.. let me know what you guys think….

1. Combining Elite Experience with Innovation​

  • Gruden’s NFL Pedigree: Jon Gruden is a Super Bowl-winning coach with decades of NFL experience. He has an extensive knowledge of pro-style offenses and knows how to develop players for the next level. Pairing him with Heupel’s innovative, fast-paced college offense would create a dynamic coaching duo that merges professional-level strategy with cutting-edge college tactics.
  • Heupel’s Offensive Genius: Josh Heupel is known for his explosive offensive schemes, but sometimes struggles on defense and in situational play-calling. Gruden could complement Heupel by bringing a more balanced, pro-style approach that focuses on game management, defense, and adjusting to tough SEC competition. Together, they’d make a more well-rounded staff that covers both innovation and experience.

2. Revolutionary in College Football​

  • First-Ever Co-Head Coaches: College football has never seen a true co-head coaching structure, and Tennessee could pioneer this approach. Imagine the recruitment and media attention this groundbreaking move would generate. Bringing in Gruden as co-head coach would make headlines across the nation and put Tennessee at the forefront of football innovation. This unique leadership duo would offer something no other program can.
  • Specialized Leadership: Heupel could focus on the offense and player development, while Gruden handles the defense, game management, and team discipline. This split would allow each coach to focus on their strengths, making the team stronger as a whole. Gruden's intense personality would give the Vols the edge in preparation and game-day adjustments.

3. Recruiting Powerhouse​

  • NFL Connection: Gruden’s NFL resume would be a massive draw for recruits looking to go pro. Players would see the direct pipeline to the NFL under his mentorship, while still benefiting from Heupel’s offensive-minded system. Imagine the appeal of a program where recruits are learning from a former NFL head coach and an offensive innovator.
  • Reinvigorating Tennessee's Image: Tennessee needs a jolt to return to its glory days, and this co-head coach idea could be just the thing to revitalize the program. The media buzz and recruiting hype from having two high-profile coaches would put Tennessee back on the map and bring excitement back to Neyland Stadium.

4. Solving the Vols’ Current Struggles​

  • Defensive Focus: Gruden would bring an NFL-level understanding of defense and player discipline, areas where Tennessee has been inconsistent under Heupel. By sharing head coach duties, Gruden could handle defense and tough, in-game decision-making, while Heupel keeps his focus on crafting explosive offensive plays.
  • Balancing Game Management: While Heupel has shown brilliance in offensive schemes, his game management and defensive oversight have left room for improvement. Gruden's experience in managing every aspect of a football team could help guide the Vols in tighter, more strategic ways, especially in high-pressure SEC games.

Conclusion: A Revolutionary Move​

This co-head coach structure would not only be a first in college football but could set a new standard for elite programs looking to maximize their coaching potential. By adding Jon Gruden’s experience and intensity to Josh Heupel’s offensive genius, Tennessee would create a dual-threat leadership team unlike anything ever seen. This bold, forward-thinking move could bring the Vols back to national prominence.
Click to expand...
Good God, how did I ever miss this gem?

God does lookout for me afterall...

Merry Christmas VolNation 🎅 👍
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hairy Vols
#134
#134
Hairy Vols said:
Here's why adding Jon Gruden as a co-head coach alongside Josh Heupel could be a groundbreaking move for the Tennessee Vols.. let me know what you guys think….

1. Combining Elite Experience with Innovation​

  • Gruden’s NFL Pedigree: Jon Gruden is a Super Bowl-winning coach with decades of NFL experience. He has an extensive knowledge of pro-style offenses and knows how to develop players for the next level. Pairing him with Heupel’s innovative, fast-paced college offense would create a dynamic coaching duo that merges professional-level strategy with cutting-edge college tactics.
  • Heupel’s Offensive Genius: Josh Heupel is known for his explosive offensive schemes, but sometimes struggles on defense and in situational play-calling. Gruden could complement Heupel by bringing a more balanced, pro-style approach that focuses on game management, defense, and adjusting to tough SEC competition. Together, they’d make a more well-rounded staff that covers both innovation and experience.

2. Revolutionary in College Football​

  • First-Ever Co-Head Coaches: College football has never seen a true co-head coaching structure, and Tennessee could pioneer this approach. Imagine the recruitment and media attention this groundbreaking move would generate. Bringing in Gruden as co-head coach would make headlines across the nation and put Tennessee at the forefront of football innovation. This unique leadership duo would offer something no other program can.
  • Specialized Leadership: Heupel could focus on the offense and player development, while Gruden handles the defense, game management, and team discipline. This split would allow each coach to focus on their strengths, making the team stronger as a whole. Gruden's intense personality would give the Vols the edge in preparation and game-day adjustments.

3. Recruiting Powerhouse​

  • NFL Connection: Gruden’s NFL resume would be a massive draw for recruits looking to go pro. Players would see the direct pipeline to the NFL under his mentorship, while still benefiting from Heupel’s offensive-minded system. Imagine the appeal of a program where recruits are learning from a former NFL head coach and an offensive innovator.
  • Reinvigorating Tennessee's Image: Tennessee needs a jolt to return to its glory days, and this co-head coach idea could be just the thing to revitalize the program. The media buzz and recruiting hype from having two high-profile coaches would put Tennessee back on the map and bring excitement back to Neyland Stadium.

4. Solving the Vols’ Current Struggles​

  • Defensive Focus: Gruden would bring an NFL-level understanding of defense and player discipline, areas where Tennessee has been inconsistent under Heupel. By sharing head coach duties, Gruden could handle defense and tough, in-game decision-making, while Heupel keeps his focus on crafting explosive offensive plays.
  • Balancing Game Management: While Heupel has shown brilliance in offensive schemes, his game management and defensive oversight have left room for improvement. Gruden's experience in managing every aspect of a football team could help guide the Vols in tighter, more strategic ways, especially in high-pressure SEC games.

Conclusion: A Revolutionary Move​

This co-head coach structure would not only be a first in college football but could set a new standard for elite programs looking to maximize their coaching potential. By adding Jon Gruden’s experience and intensity to Josh Heupel’s offensive genius, Tennessee would create a dual-threat leadership team unlike anything ever seen. This bold, forward-thinking move could bring the Vols back to national prominence.
Click to expand...

Hairy Vols said:
Here's why adding Jon Gruden as a co-head coach alongside Josh Heupel could be a groundbreaking move for the Tennessee Vols.. let me know what you guys think….

1. Combining Elite Experience with Innovation​

  • Gruden’s NFL Pedigree: Jon Gruden is a Super Bowl-winning coach with decades of NFL experience. He has an extensive knowledge of pro-style offenses and knows how to develop players for the next level. Pairing him with Heupel’s innovative, fast-paced college offense would create a dynamic coaching duo that merges professional-level strategy with cutting-edge college tactics.
  • Heupel’s Offensive Genius: Josh Heupel is known for his explosive offensive schemes, but sometimes struggles on defense and in situational play-calling. Gruden could complement Heupel by bringing a more balanced, pro-style approach that focuses on game management, defense, and adjusting to tough SEC competition. Together, they’d make a more well-rounded staff that covers both innovation and experience.

2. Revolutionary in College Football​

  • First-Ever Co-Head Coaches: College football has never seen a true co-head coaching structure, and Tennessee could pioneer this approach. Imagine the recruitment and media attention this groundbreaking move would generate. Bringing in Gruden as co-head coach would make headlines across the nation and put Tennessee at the forefront of football innovation. This unique leadership duo would offer something no other program can.
  • Specialized Leadership: Heupel could focus on the offense and player development, while Gruden handles the defense, game management, and team discipline. This split would allow each coach to focus on their strengths, making the team stronger as a whole. Gruden's intense personality would give the Vols the edge in preparation and game-day adjustments.

3. Recruiting Powerhouse​

  • NFL Connection: Gruden’s NFL resume would be a massive draw for recruits looking to go pro. Players would see the direct pipeline to the NFL under his mentorship, while still benefiting from Heupel’s offensive-minded system. Imagine the appeal of a program where recruits are learning from a former NFL head coach and an offensive innovator.
  • Reinvigorating Tennessee's Image: Tennessee needs a jolt to return to its glory days, and this co-head coach idea could be just the thing to revitalize the program. The media buzz and recruiting hype from having two high-profile coaches would put Tennessee back on the map and bring excitement back to Neyland Stadium.

4. Solving the Vols’ Current Struggles​

  • Defensive Focus: Gruden would bring an NFL-level understanding of defense and player discipline, areas where Tennessee has been inconsistent under Heupel. By sharing head coach duties, Gruden could handle defense and tough, in-game decision-making, while Heupel keeps his focus on crafting explosive offensive plays.
  • Balancing Game Management: While Heupel has shown brilliance in offensive schemes, his game management and defensive oversight have left room for improvement. Gruden's experience in managing every aspect of a football team could help guide the Vols in tighter, more strategic ways, especially in high-pressure SEC games.

Conclusion: A Revolutionary Move​

This co-head coach structure would not only be a first in college football but could set a new standard for elite programs looking to maximize their coaching potential. By adding Jon Gruden’s experience and intensity to Josh Heupel’s offensive genius, Tennessee would create a dual-threat leadership team unlike anything ever seen. This bold, forward-thinking move could bring the Vols back to national prominence.
Click to expand...
How much do you pay a month for the AI?
 
#135
#135
After a back and forth following an idea recommending that Tennessee use only volunteer coaches (see here: In theory, the idea of Tennessee’s football team using only volunteer coaches to save money for player compensation taps into a certain idealism linked to the "Volunteer" spirit. However, in practice, this would likely harm the program’s competitiveness and performance. Coaches are essential for player development, strategy, and leadership, and having skilled, well-paid staff is crucial in maintaining a top-tier football program. A more balanced approach might involve exploring ways to fairly compensate players through NIL opportunities while still investing in quality coaching and support staff. Ensuring both the coaching and playing sides are adequately supported could help Tennessee continue its football success while respecting the tradition of the Volunteers)
and then arguing with da chat that it was only offering up with status quo concepts we finally had a breakthrough…

You're absolutely right that traditional solutions — even with performance-based pay or mixed coaching models — still fall within the bounds of the current system. If Tennessee wants to truly disrupt the status quo and find a novel approach that could potentially reshape college football in a way that is both competitive and innovative, we’ll need to think outside the box. Here are a few more unconventional ideas that could completely change the game:

1. Player-Coach Hybrid Model​

Concept: Instead of having full-time coaches, players themselves take on coaching roles — particularly for specific units or positions. This would leverage the knowledge and passion of the players while reducing coaching costs.

  • How It Works: Star players (or even less prominent ones with high football IQs) could take on coaching responsibilities as part of their scholarship package. They would get a stipend or “salary” for their time spent mentoring younger players or working with position groups. This model could include a tiered structure: senior players lead training for freshmen, while coaches oversee game strategy and provide feedback.
  • Potential Benefits:
    • Authenticity: Players who have a deep connection with the program and know the system intimately would provide highly relatable coaching to their teammates.
    • Player Empowerment: This approach could give players more control over their development, appealing to those who want a more hands-on approach to their growth both as athletes and as potential coaches.
    • Cost Reduction: Fewer paid coaches would lead to significant savings, which could be redirected toward player compensation, improving facilities, or NIL deals.
  • Challenges:
    • Lack of Experience: Players-turned-coaches might lack the tactical and psychological expertise of seasoned professional coaches. This model would work best with some coaching oversight from part-time or volunteer assistants.
    • Risk of Overwork: Expecting players to take on a coaching role could interfere with their development as athletes, leading to burnout or distractions.

2. Decentralized Coaching Network (Crowd-Sourced Coaching)​

Concept: Create a decentralized, crowd-sourced coaching system where expert coaches from all over the country — including former players, analysts, and even professional coaches from other sports — volunteer or work on a part-time basis to provide insights, tutorials, and strategies.

  • How It Works: Using a platform (possibly an app or a proprietary software), coaches and analysts can contribute advice, breakdowns, and strategies that align with the team’s game plan. This would allow Tennessee to draw from a wide pool of talent while keeping coaching salaries low. The head coach and key staff would still provide oversight and manage the program, but day-to-day strategy could be crowdsourced.
  • Potential Benefits:
    • Access to Expertise: A wider network of experts could provide insights that a single staff wouldn’t be able to generate. You could tap into specialists in areas like defensive schemes, offensive strategy, player development, or mental coaching.
    • Cost Efficiency: This system could drastically reduce the number of full-time coaching staff required, saving money and potentially diverting those savings toward player compensation or better training equipment.
    • Innovative Edge: Tennessee could market this model as an innovative, tech-driven approach to coaching, creating a buzz around the program that may appeal to recruits looking for something different.
  • Challenges:
    • Lack of Cohesion: A decentralized system might lead to disjointed strategies or inconsistent player development if the oversight isn’t strong enough. It would be difficult to ensure that all coaches and analysts are on the same page.
    • Tech Dependency: Heavy reliance on technology and platforms could be prone to technical issues and could alienate some traditionalists who prefer the personal touch of direct coaching.

3. Fan-Powered Coaching Model​

Concept: Allow the fanbase to have a say in coaching decisions, tactics, or even game plans through a voting system that involves fans in real-time decision-making. This could be a radical way to reshape college football culture, leveraging fan loyalty to drive program direction.

  • How It Works: Fans could vote on certain aspects of game strategy or team management through an official platform. For example, after each game, fans could vote on tactical aspects such as what areas of the game to improve, which players to focus on developing, or even "the fan's choice" MVP. Coaches would use the feedback as part of their decision-making process. Some fan-driven decisions might even influence practice routines, game plans, or player development priorities. The idea is to create a deep connection between the team and its fanbase, potentially creating an unparalleled level of investment.
  • Potential Benefits:
    • Increased Fan Engagement: This could drive unparalleled fan loyalty and engagement. The fanbase would feel invested in every aspect of the program, which could translate to stronger support, more donations, and greater attendance.
    • Unique Marketing Angle: Tennessee could market this approach as a groundbreaking, fan-first program that revolutionizes the relationship between players, coaches, and supporters. This could attract attention from recruits and media alike.
    • Free Innovation: Fans from various walks of life, including former players or analysts, could bring fresh ideas or creative approaches that coaching staff might not have considered.
  • Challenges:
    • Unqualified Decision-Making: While fan engagement could be a strong point, it would likely be difficult to ensure that the fans’ suggestions are grounded in real football strategy. The risk of poor decisions being made based on popular opinion could harm the program.
    • Instability: The program could become chaotic if decisions are made based on a combination of coaching input and fan votes rather than a cohesive strategy from a professional staff.

4. Player-Run Program with Collective Decision-Making​

Concept: Shift more responsibility onto the players themselves, turning Tennessee into the first truly player-run program in major college football. Coaches would become facilitators or managers, but players would have significant input into game planning, practice routines, and even leadership roles.

  • How It Works: The team’s captain or leadership council could have the final say on tactical approaches, player development, and even which players start in games. Coaches would step into a role of guiding players and offering tactical advice, but the players would make final decisions. This model would rely heavily on an empowered, self-driven team that works together to hold each other accountable and make decisions as a unit.
  • Potential Benefits:
    • High Player Engagement: Players would feel deeply invested in every aspect of the program and would take responsibility for both their individual success and the success of the team.
    • Autonomy and Leadership Development: It would foster leadership skills and maturity among players, giving them experience that goes beyond football.
    • Innovative Recruiting: The idea of a player-run program could attract players who are looking for a more hands-on, self-directed college experience.
  • Challenges:
    • Lack of Experience: Players, no matter how talented, lack the experience to run a complex program. A pure player-run model might lack the expertise and strategic oversight necessary to compete at the highest levels.
    • Inconsistent Leadership: If players are in charge, there could be tension or power struggles, especially when it comes to younger players vs. veterans or between different factions on the team.

Conclusion:​

The status quo isn’t working for Tennessee, and looking for novel approaches is essential to changing the program’s trajectory. The ideas above — from a player-coach hybrid model to a fan-powered coaching system or even a player-run program — represent a complete departure from the traditional coaching structure.

All these ideas face significant challenges, but they could generate the type of buzz and attention that could ultimately allow Tennessee to carve out its own unique niche in college football. The key is to combine creativity with practicalityand be willing to take risks in ways that might revolutionize not just the Vols’ fortunes, but college football as a whole.
 
#137
#137
Instead of keeping Halzle, the vols could find much better offense success by letting Tennessee Volunteers students call offensive plays via surveys just before the snap:

1. Engagement and Entertainment Value: Allowing students to participate in real-time play-calling would create a one-of-a-kind fan experience, rivaling "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire" or crowd-based decision-making in esports. The buzz alone could sell out games, boost merchandise sales, and make Neyland Stadium the most talked-about venue in college football.


2. Crowdsourced Wisdom: While offensive coordinator Joey Halzle may struggle with predictability, thousands of fresh minds with nothing to lose might bring creativity and surprise to the game. Crowd psychology could outmaneuver defensive coordinators who prepare for traditional play-calling patterns.


3. Cost Savings: By “hiring” students through surveys, Tennessee could cut coordinator salaries and reinvest that money into recruiting or facilities. Even a token scholarship for participation would be far cheaper than the cost of maintaining a full-time, underperforming coach.


4. Analytics Meets Fun: The students could use AI or predictive models in surveys to inform decisions, combining real-time data with fan intuition. The novelty might attract tech companies as sponsors, further offsetting costs.


5. Morale Boost for Students: The opportunity to directly influence the game could create lifelong loyalty to the program. Imagine the pride of knowing the game-winning play was called by a collective decision in Section YY of the student section.


6. Unpredictability: Defenses study coaches’ tendencies, but how do you prepare for plays decided by thousands of fans who could call a flea flicker on 4th-and-1 or a QB sneak on 2nd-and-20? This unpredictability could neutralize more talented defensive units.



A serious proposal for long-term strategy, such an approach could add fun, experimentation, and chaos to the game. After all, when you're struggling offensively, why not let the crowd have a shot at it?
 
#138
#138
207 others said:
Instead of keeping Halzle, the vols could find much better offense success by letting Tennessee Volunteers students call offensive plays via surveys just before the snap:

1. Engagement and Entertainment Value: Allowing students to participate in real-time play-calling would create a one-of-a-kind fan experience, rivaling "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire" or crowd-based decision-making in esports. The buzz alone could sell out games, boost merchandise sales, and make Neyland Stadium the most talked-about venue in college football.


2. Crowdsourced Wisdom: While offensive coordinator Joey Halzle may struggle with predictability, thousands of fresh minds with nothing to lose might bring creativity and surprise to the game. Crowd psychology could outmaneuver defensive coordinators who prepare for traditional play-calling patterns.


3. Cost Savings: By “hiring” students through surveys, Tennessee could cut coordinator salaries and reinvest that money into recruiting or facilities. Even a token scholarship for participation would be far cheaper than the cost of maintaining a full-time, underperforming coach.


4. Analytics Meets Fun: The students could use AI or predictive models in surveys to inform decisions, combining real-time data with fan intuition. The novelty might attract tech companies as sponsors, further offsetting costs.


5. Morale Boost for Students: The opportunity to directly influence the game could create lifelong loyalty to the program. Imagine the pride of knowing the game-winning play was called by a collective decision in Section YY of the student section.


6. Unpredictability: Defenses study coaches’ tendencies, but how do you prepare for plays decided by thousands of fans who could call a flea flicker on 4th-and-1 or a QB sneak on 2nd-and-20? This unpredictability could neutralize more talented defensive units.



A serious proposal for long-term strategy, such an approach could add fun, experimentation, and chaos to the game. After all, when you're struggling offensively, why not let the crowd have a shot at it?
Click to expand...
I love it. Applications to UTK would skyrocket if applicants knew there was a good chance they'd make an offensive play call each season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 207 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top