Cohen likely to cooperate with prosecution

This imaginary stuff is kinda fun. I bet the Trump syndicate has dirt on Chuck Schumer.

They are going to flip on him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Even if he flips, who's to say he actually can provide verifiable information that leads to impeachment? He can tell Mueller that Trump was born in Nigeria, but without concrete proof, Mueller still has nothing. Words alone will not lead to an impeachment. Cohen will have to provide proof. And maybe he has it, but maybe he doesn't. Maybe he tells Mueller some things that sends him chasing down a different rabbit hole. It's all speculation and no actual substance so who knows what eventually happens.

So you accept that he might flip and rush to say any information he provides would have to be confirmed. But of course, same as the dossier. Consider this as a potential confirmation of part of the dossier.
 
We're not singing his praises as a person. We're not celebrating his politics. We just like that he likely has incriminating evidence on the Trump crime family syndicate and he's willing to share it. Purely instrumental interest in Cohen.

What is this, the mafia? Trump crime family? As opposed to what? The Clinton crime family? I guess that would explain how all those bodies ended up in the morgue...

Seriously, if Mueller can provide legitimate proof Trump should be impeached, fine. He'll have my full support. But why is it Dems are so obsessed with the supposed crimes of Trump while completely accepting of the crimes of the Clintons(most especially Hillary)? Do you have morals or were they completely replaced by party loyalty?
 
So you accept that he might flip and rush to say any information he provides would have to be confirmed. But of course, same as the dossier. Consider this as a potential confirmation of part of the dossier.

Russia Russia Russia 😂
 
What is this, the mafia? Trump crime family? As opposed to what? The Clinton crime family? I guess that would explain how all those bodies ended up in the morgue...

Seriously, if Mueller can provide legitimate proof Trump should be impeached, fine. He'll have my full support. But why is it Dems are so obsessed with the supposed crimes of Trump while completely accepting of the crimes of the Clintons(most especially Hillary)? Do you have morals or were they completely replaced by party loyalty?

If there was a provable crime by Hillary she would be in jail now, So stop your *****ing and crying that Hillary is not in jail.
 
So you accept that he might flip and rush to say any information he provides would have to be confirmed. But of course, same as the dossier. Consider this as a potential confirmation of part of the dossier.

The fact Hillary and the DNC funded the Steele Dossier taints that report to high hell. It baffles me you don't see that. If the situation were reversed, and Trump and the GOP had funded some incriminating dossier on Obama or Hillary, are you telling me you wouldn't seriously question it? I sure as hell would, and I can't stand Hillary. The source does matter.
 
If there was a provable crime by Hillary she would be in jail now, So stop your *****ing and crying that Hillary is not in jail.

Hillary benefitted from knowing the right people and knowing how to use her power. Yes, it is just my opinion, but, I believe she is the most corrupt politician of my lifetime, and it's not even close.
 
It's okay when it's Trump.

Threatening a child, calling his daughter anything they want, demeaning his wife. It's all okay because Trump.
Oh my God what a hypocrite you are. How many jokes have you and your cult made about Michelle Obama.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Well, she is a man and an adult.

b99240a2b6b64a4e338f2fbf3ed4a70ff77ef888649492441d19b52e2f3747ea_1.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
The fact Hillary and the DNC funded the Steele Dossier taints that report to high hell. It baffles me you don't see that. If the situation were reversed, and Trump and the GOP had funded some incriminating dossier on Obama or Hillary, are you telling me you wouldn't seriously question it? I sure as hell would, and I can't stand Hillary. The source does matter.

As a preliminary matter, do we know whether Steele knew he was doing work for Clinton's campaign? Do we know if the Clinton campaign ever saw the dossier? They certainly didn't seem to make any use of it if they did.

Putting those preliminary matters aside, you don't hire an opposition researcher to go out and make up stories out of whole cloth. If there are stories that can never be substantiated, they can't be used. So what motive does Steele have to concoct stories? He's not going to be retained again if he provides a bunch of lies that a candidate uses and then gets egg on her face when they can't be backed up.
 

VN Store



Back
Top