kptvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2005
- Messages
- 27,294
- Likes
- 1
All three are excellent backs, they just bring totally differemt elements to the game...I just think criticizing Foster when he doesn't have a good game is dead WRONG, I think he can be just as productive if given the same amount of carries, And there aren't that many carries to go around for 3 backs, Who's ever hot get's the bulk of the carries, today Lamarcus was blazin hot, I mean HOT!!! With the passing game being the strength of our team now, We'll probably see the backs get 20 rushes between them...I'll always be a Foster fan as well as Coker/Hardesty, I think we need to pick them up rather than critcize them..Foster had excellent games against Vandy and Tennessee last year...
Coker's speed masks a multitude of ineptitude. Take out the long run and calculate his yards per carry. It was pretty pedestrian.So our offensive line is much worse than last years?Is this why Foster is not running any where like last year, and the reason Coker is doing so well is his speed makes up for the lines inability to block?
I think if you take away Coker's blazing speed, he would have just as much trouble picking up yards as the other two backs. A lot of his yards come from running around the offensive line. That's not exactly finding a hole.
Which game were you watching? Could it be that he hits the hole much quicker (than Foster or Hardesty). The line doesn't have to hold thier blocks as long when he is in the game. The longer runs he made today were on counter plays. On the long run he obviously wasn't touched although there were 7 at the line.