I'm all for having quality out of conference schedules but someone has to pump the brakes on scheduling these powerhouse football programs, year in and year out--at least while we're trying to rebuild the program back to its former glory.
What good does going on the road to Eugene, Oregon and Norman, Oklahoma do for a team that will be fighting for a bowl birth in November? None.
Yeah, I get it..."what if we won those games??" The national exposure would be tremendous but the likelihood of that is slim...to none.
What will likely happen is we take a beating on national television and only add fuel to the perception that we're still a long way from coming back, while also exposing some very real weaknesses on the team for the teams that really matter on our schedule--the SEC.
I'd rather pin my hopes on beating UK and Vandy in November for a chance to go to a BETTER bowl game, rather than beating them to go to one AT ALL.
And I'll cut those who disagree with me off--that's not a defeatist attitude, it's seeing our situation for what it really is and playing the better odds that scheduling a comparable team, talent wise, i.e. NC State will do more for us than the alternative. Doing so will yield a more competitive game, a much more likely win, boost the confidence of the team, as well as the amount of national exposure we receive--all the while increasing the odds of a potential January bowl game.
When's the last time we went to a January bowl game by the way, 2007??
Now, that being said...I would not condone this tactic WHEN we return to our former glory. I think the Nebraska series that starts in a few years could pit two top-15 teams against each other.