ClearwaterVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2008
- Messages
- 16,188
- Likes
- 17,782
Possibly. Consumption is better than income.Then we’d need to switch from the idea of income tax to a consumption tax.
And how will I pay that loan?
I'm no accountant, but i think if you owe debt to a lender and the lender forgives the debt (my understanding of what you are proposing), they are supposed to report that debt forgiveness to the IRS, which creates income for you.You don’t have to if you own the corporation that lends it to you. Your corporation won’t turn the loan over to a collection agency.
Or another way to put cash into an individual’s hands - they borrow against their equity. Margin loan interest in the current tax code is deductible against dividends. So the taxable dividends paid to the owner won’t be taxed as long as there are interest charges to off set the receipts.
The bottom line, if corporations have a zero tax rate and the additional burden is shifted to individuals then people will use their corporations to shield the income generated by the business. Business owners already pull resources out of their businesses in ways other than cash.
My Corp loaned money to us a few years ago. My cpa had me sign a loan agreement with myself and put the payback on autodraft.I'm no accountant, but i think if you owe debt to a lender and the lender forgives the debt (my understanding of what you are proposing), they are supposed to report that debt forgiveness to the IRS, which creates income for you.
I'm no accountant, but i think if you owe debt to a lender and the lender forgives the debt (my understanding of what you are proposing), they are supposed to report that debt forgiveness to the IRS, which creates income for you.
My Corp loaned money to us a few years ago. My cpa had me sign a loan agreement with myself and put the payback on autodraft.
The IRS is very wise to the forgivable loan tactic.
I disagree in principle that people or corps exploit anything when they keep more (all) of their money away from government.And there’s the other scenario that I suggested. If you have equity, you can borrow against it. Margin loans with brokers aren’t on a repayment schedule. The interest just gets rolled into the loan (and that interest is deductible against dividend and interest payments to the individual).
Commerce is taxed. That’s how the country works. If a for profit corporate entity’s business income is taxed at zero percent, then people will find ways to exploit it. They already do. It would simply happen on a far larger scale.
You don’t have to if you own the corporation that lends it to you. Your corporation won’t turn the loan over to a collection agency.
Or another way to put cash into an individual’s hands - they borrow against their equity. Margin loan interest in the current tax code is deductible against dividends. So the taxable dividends paid to the owner won’t be taxed as long as there are interest charges to off set the receipts.
The bottom line, if corporations have a zero tax rate and the additional burden is shifted to individuals then people will use their corporations to shield the income generated by the business. Business owners already pull resources out of their businesses in ways other than cash.
I disagree in principle that people or corps exploit anything when they keep more (all) of their money away from government.
+ Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Mark Suckerberg, etc etc etc etcWarren. Buffett.