Could this be the best class ever for Fulmer?

[Vol67]

Why would 2004 be rated higher than 2007? We had 2 5*s, 8 4*s, 8 3*s, and 6 2*s and finished with a star average of 3.25 and 1,748 points. We finished 11th in the nation. So far this year, we have 5 5*s, 10 4*s, and 15 3*s with a star average of 3.67 and 2,667 points. We are currently in 2nd. Is this only based on field production because no way it is a better class on paper? The other 3 didn't go by the same rating system.

2007 is not even signed yet. Check back in 2010. I don't decide classes are good on signing day but during Jr and Sr year. 2004 still has a chance to move up

 

[hvwarrior58]

Well if it is that case, I could argue for a few other 90s classes that would be above 2004.

 

[lacrossepro70]

A lot of the 2004 players were busts... especially on defense.

 

[k-sny-vol]

The class of 2005 was ranked way more higher than 2004. It was #4 on rivals, and #1 on scout.

 

[f1ip]

Hola everyone,Tenn is goen to b great this yaer...Goo Vols
Very good clase lots talent..

holla to you too!!!!!!

 

[Vol67]

The class of 2005 was ranked way more higher than 2004. It was #4 on rivals, and #1 on scout.

Still too early for the '05 class