Well first, some of you guys & gals are so punchy because of abuse-raids by cave-men that you didn't actually read the original post all the way through and see that he actually said he was being sarcastic but expected to see something like what he said posted by one of our misogynistically retarded members.
IOW, he was making fun of anyone who actually thought what he said, so lighten up and save it for the real morons.
Second, for a long time I've been wondering something about CPS. Back in '82, I was at UMontana. Back then, the Lady Griz were one of a tiny group of schools (some of them, like LA Tech, pretty small) who were playing the kind of modern women's-version of hoops rather than treating it as something cute women did, and not to be taken that seriously. Having been born in TN, I naturally perked up my ears when over the next couple of years I was suddenly hearing about CPS and the Lady Vols on the local sports news. I mean, first, getting any women's sports news on t.v. was unusual, much less news about a team a couple thousand miles away.
Pat didn't just put the Lady Vols on the map, I believe she was a major force in the rapid evolution and spread of modern women's hoops.
But what that means is that, ironically, as a result of her impact upon the female game, there is actually an ever-declining motivation for the best players to come to UT. I know that sounds weird, but just think about it. Thanks to Pat and her proof that women's hoops could and should be taken seriously, other programs were able to piggy-back and build upon her success. [[I'd love, once before I die, to force a certain UConn coach (who shall remain nameless since I don't feel like throwing up the good scotch I just drank) to admit that he owes his career to CPS.]] A consequence of her being such a national developmental force, is that while UT may still be the best program overall, there are now a whole lot of great if lesser programs. A HS girl no longer has to choose between developing her athletic gifts by going to Montana, LA Tech, Stanford, and a scant few other teams or going to the school that met all her other needs and desires like back in '82. Ironically, thanks in a very real way to CPS she now has many, many more options.
So, anyway, my point is that I'm amazed that this year's Pat-ettes are unusual rather than the norm. CPS isn't just our coach, she's the person who helped make the women's version of hoops so respected that even old guys with testosterone-control problems like Bobby Knight are proud to go on camera giving her her due.
UT's less-than-stellar year not only isn't a sign of a decline in Pat's abilities, it's at least partly a sign of her phenomenal role in the development of women's sports, and thereby the creation of her own competition. Frankly, all things considered, I'm amazed both that this is the worst year we've had recently, and that it only sucks (if you look at it objectively) because CPS has given us all a messiah complex.