Criminal Tax Evasion Charges Forthcoming Against Trump Org.

#27
#27
Orangeburst said:
They are just trying to discredit his influence further. Just like the 1/6 Commission and just in time for midterms.
It would be interesting to see the Treasury Dept vs DOJ in a standoff. I would buy tickets.
Click to expand...
I'm interested in seeing how the former supreme court nominee does in his lawsuit against the state of Georgia's voting law.
 
#28
#28
Orangeburst said:
BTW..how the rehab coming? U done?
Click to expand...
Yeah I’ve been released since end of January but I still rehab it every day. It’s more keeping extension now and getting rid of all the “crunching” in the joint. The shoulder has strength in it and I just do normal activity including working in the shop and yard. I am still tentative on really pushing big loads it’s probably more mental though. Thanks for asking 👍
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
#29
#29
Let’s hear more about the multiple sources leaking a pending indictment. That sounds a bit criminal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
#31
#31
OrangeTsar said:
This is now the endgame of the American Republic. Once you start prosecuting and jailing previous leaders, it is only a matter of time before one side or the other jails ALL of its opponents and establishes a single party state.
Click to expand...
Does evidence of unlawful conduct factor into your scenario, or nah?
 
#34
#34
Velo Vol said:
Does evidence of unlawful conduct factor into your scenario, or nah?
Click to expand...
It doesn’t matter to me. There is plenty enough evidence to bring corruption charges against the Clinton Foundation but I don’t think it helps to prosecute the Clintons. Like I say, pick ANYONE in DC, hire enough investigators, and you will find something to charge them with. That doesn’t mean you should. Prosecution the Clintons, just like the current case against Trump is all about shutting down your opponent, not serving the cause of justice. It is for revenge and not anything else.
Of course, once we get evidence showing what happened to Epstein, maybe that all changes. 😜
 
#36
#36
OrangeTsar said:
Like I say, pick ANYONE in DC, hire enough investigators, and you will find something to charge them with.
Click to expand...
Maybe. But conviction is a much higher bar. And if a prosecutor brings a failed case, then it does look political. Which is an inherent check in the system against doing so.
 
#37
#37
Velo Vol said:
Maybe. But conviction is a much higher bar. And if a prosecutor brings a failed case, then it does look political. Which is an inherent check in the system against doing so.
Click to expand...
Except that the Ds have enough rogue prosecutors to keep bringing charges in state after state until some political judge makes one stick
 
#40
#40
BigOrangeMojo said:
Let's see whats in here before we throw Trump under the jail...
Click to expand...

Why start now? Isn’t making up lies about him and repeating them endlessly how it’s done? He urinates on Russian hookers when he’s not telling us to drink Clorox and inject disinfectant into our arms, right?
 
#41
#41
Thunder Good-Oil said:
Why start now? Isn’t making up lies about him and repeating them endlessly how it’s done? He urinates on Russian hookers when he’s not telling us to drink Clorox and inject disinfectant into our arms, right?
Click to expand...

For me, no. I want to see whats in there before I form an opinion.
 
#43
#43
VolStrom said:
I'm interested in seeing how the former supreme court nominee does in his lawsuit against the state of Georgia's voting law.
Click to expand...
He’s also busy suing to stop a major merger between two insurance broker giants, Willis Towers Watson and Aon. I bet there’s quite a money trail behind that action. That merger has been in the works for a year, got through the company boards, got through the EU, I believe through the SEC as well, and about 2 months before going live the DOJ sues to stop it. Money, money, and money.
 
#44
#44
Velo Vol said:
I guess a "rogue prosecutor" is someone who enforces laws against someone you like.
Click to expand...
No, it’s someone who focusing on political outcome instead of impartiality enforcement of the law. Basically our version of the Soviet kommisars. Soros has funded them everywhere. Kim Fox in Chicago, Garçon in LA, Schmidt in Portland
Disgusting parodies of justice
 
  • Like
Reactions: Caculator
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top