than Martin. I believe Martin played WR, for the most part if not entirely at UT, and he didn't catch a lot of balls. He was obviously more suited for TE, given his size--which is what he became in the NFL, and I think he actually was more productive in the NFL than he was at UT. .
Croom reminds me of sharp the tightend .see there was Shannon sharp and another sharp one played wide receiver the other played TE.
I also remember David Martin getting ran down from behind against Neb. in what looked like an easy TD.
He isnt too big to play WR
Calvin Johnson
Vincent Jackson
Marques* Colston
No. You spell it M-A-R-T-I-N. Fulmer wanted him at TE but Martin was convinced he was a WR and didn't want to move.
But once the NFL basically said you're TE or you're an ex-football player, he suddenly realized that he was a TE.
In fact, this discussion came up about who made more money in the NFL- WR's or CB's. Both have some well-paid players. It all depends on your size. Other than Santonio Holmes, Desean Jackson, Percy Harvin, and Mike Wallace, most of the top 10 highest paid WR's (and other well=paid) in the NFL are big. Jackson and Harvin are also return specialists. C. Johnson, A. Johnson, Larry Fitzgerald, Vincent Jackson, Brandon Marshall, Sydney Rice, Dwyane Bowe, Demaryius Thomas, AJ Green, Julio Jones are all over 6'2. Even A. Boldin, Roddy White, and Dez Bryant are physical.
So, if you can play both ways out of high school and under 6 feet, it appears you have a better chance at making money as a CB.