It's not that he just took a better job, it's the way he left the UT football program. UT may not have a program as good as USC's at the moment, but it's still a damn good, tradition rich program. I know Al Davis is a nutcase, but that didn't change the fact that Kiffin looked really bad after that whole incident in Oakland. UT gave him a chance. Kiffin's choices seemed to be between UT, Clemson, and Washington. Maybe not, I'm not exactly clear, but the Vols really went out on a limb to give him a shot at a major football program. Kiffin went on talking about whatever he pleased. I'm not saying he shouldn't have done that, but he did cause a lot of enemies. That left all of us Vols fans to deal with that. Now that he's gone, it's the fans that look stupid. He was supposed to make UT better, and we aren't any better off than we were right after Fulmer was fired.Remember how classless it is when you get a chance to take a better job.
I feel confident in saying that if a major company went out on a limb to hire me to an important position, I wouldn't do anything which I felt would be destructive to that company, even if it meant turning down what is essentially the same job in a better location.Remember how classless it is when you get a chance to take a better job.
Nor should it. At the end of the day, Kiffin's only loyalty should be to himself. You think UT would have had any qualms about firing him with time left on his contract if he strung a couple of 5-7s together? It's a business. People who want to act as if coaching at UT is some sort of sacred trust need to wake the Hell up and join the real world.I'm pretty sure it didn't bother him at all.
You don't think it should matter at all that UT was willing to give him a chance after his previous situation. I would assume he would be a little grateful that he was at Tennessee and not Clemson. He completely screwed Tennessee. We're in so much trouble in the near future because of what Kiffin did. I blame Hamilton for making it so easy for Kiffin to bail, but there is no denying he essentially chose UT's fate.Nor should it. At the end of the day, Kiffin's only loyalty should be to himself. You think UT would have had any qualms about firing him with time left on his contract if he strung a couple of 5-7s together? It's a business. People who want to act as if coaching at UT is some sort of sacred trust need to wake the Hell up and join the real world.
He was hired to make UT better. We aren't any better off than when he took the job.
Not always. Also, I love how everyone is decrying Kiffin's lack of "loyalty" to UT. Ask Bob Huggins what kind of loyalty he got after passing on three NBA jobs and multiple great college jobs to stay at Cincinnati. Ask Larry Eustachy how loyal Iowa State was to him at the first sign of trouble. Ask Barry Switzer how much OU stood behind him. If people were honest and simply said, "I only yell about loyalty when it benefits the team whose color laundry I root for" I'd be fine with it. Instead, everyone gets sanctimonious and acts as if Kiffin pissed on the altar at the Sistine Chapel.There's a difference at certain exec positions like CEO. Those guys have succession plans and shepherd in the new guy, unless hammered for cause.