He left out the backup to Randolph last season who looked impressive to me on the post workout pic, Max Arnold. Perhaps a tid bit of racism at play there. What do y'all think? I mean, he included people who Arnold obviously beat out last season as they were under him on the depth chart.
Opinions are like a**holes so the saying goes. Your response still does not answer the question of why players lower on the depth chart last year are mentioned but Arnold was left out. Also, I have watched Randolph have as many plays made on him as anyone else if not more. Not sure why he always gets a pass by volnation. It is a tough one to figure out.Arnold is a practice player. Just too much talent and speed in this league for him to be getting pt.
And seeing him, probst, swafford and toney on the field trying to win games late last year is something I don't want to see again.
And imo, mcneil and Coleman need to work at nickel. McNeil can't play the ball well at safety and is too slow of foot. A foot that looks like it's wearing shoes 2 sizes too big. Coleman has no instinct at cb and is always on his heels. His run support is solid though and I like him covering a tight space in the middle of the field without having to worry about getting beat deep, and I like him coming up hard against the run, or qb spy if we need it.
What are you talking about? Arnold should never play, and there was no body for him to beat out last year...He wasn't listed, because he will not be a factor next year.. Just Like Orta... Just shows how bad our depth was last year across the board. Also, Randolph has been our best DB for a few years now...Opinions are like a**holes so the saying goes. Your response still does not answer the question of why players lower on the depth chart last year are mentioned but Arnold was left out. Also, I have watched Randolph have as many plays made on him as anyone else if not more. Not sure why he always gets a pass by volnation. It is a tough one to figure out.
Opinions are like a**holes so the saying goes. Your response still does not answer the question of why players lower on the depth chart last year are mentioned but Arnold was left out. Also, I have watched Randolph have as many plays made on him as anyone else if not more. Not sure why he always gets a pass by volnation. It is a tough one to figure out.
Randolph has the picks cause he is out there more than any other safety. I do not recall any picks that any high school player could have made. If the ball is thrown right to you then most grown men can catch it.As far as players lower on the depth chart ahead of Arnold, it's probably because there are more players than Orta competing for a backup spot and we have more players that can play safety this year.
Randolph doesn't blow nearly as many coverages as McNeil and doesn't miss the tackles. He also has more picks and pbu's. I don't know that we are watching the same games if you see McNeil playing at the level of Randolph in run support or pass coverage.
You said he is out there more than any other safety, why cause he is the best we have at his position. I know everyone on vn roots for the walk on to get playing time and possibly start but I'm looking forward to never seeing another walk on on the 2 deep ever again( unless he proves worthy) because IMO that proves that you have quality depth and no longer need to use a walk on anymore to fill out a depth chart.Randolph has the picks cause he is out there more than any other safety. I do not recall any picks that any high school player could have made. If the ball is thrown right to you then most grown men can catch it.
As for AV, you seem to agree that the guys below Arnold last year suddenly got better than him....if you agree with Treece's article. I think there is much more at play in your mind and Treece's as well than simply football. No other possible explanation.
I'm ready to move on to another subject but first I want to point out that Satan has had two walkons start at safety at Alabama. You have to be careful not to put so much credit to the guys that decide how many stars a kid will get by their name. There's a whole section of very good ball players that they are choosing to ignore.You said he is out there more than any other safety, why cause he is the best we have at his position. I know everyone on vn roots for the walk on to get playing time and possibly start but I'm looking forward to never seeing another walk on on the 2 deep ever again( unless he proves worthy) because IMO that proves that you have quality depth and no longer need to use a walk on anymore to fill out a depth chart.
He isn't listed because he's not on scholarship. Yes, he was higher on the depth chart than our true freshman safety (Lemond Johnson) last season. No, he won't be in the two deep again for the foreseeable future.Opinions are like a**holes so the saying goes. Your response still does not answer the question of why players lower on the depth chart last year are mentioned but Arnold was left out. Also, I have watched Randolph have as many plays made on him as anyone else if not more. Not sure why he always gets a pass by volnation. It is a tough one to figure out.
Notice what I put in parentheses before you come back with something like that.satan has had two safeties contribute out of how many Walk on players he has. I'm not saying its not nice to have them contribute I'm just saying how we have had to depend on way to many walk ons to contribute major time on the field, I'm just looking forward to where we don't have to do that anymore.I'm ready to move on to another subject but first I want to point out that Satan has had two walkons start at safety at Alabama. You have to be careful not to put so much credit to the guys that decide how many stars a kid will get by their name. There's a whole section of very good ball players that they are choosing to ignore.
I can only imagine how peed off that statement will make you.
Check the pictures of the teams that win most of the state championships in Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, etc. you'll figure it out.
I totally agree with that.Notice what I put in parentheses before you come back with something like that.satan has had two safeties contribute out of how many Walk on players he has. I'm not saying its not nice to have them contribute I'm just saying how we have had to depend on way to many walk ons to contribute major time on the field, I'm just looking forward to where we don't have to do that anymore.
He isn't listed because he's not on scholarship. Yes, he was higher on the depth chart than our true freshman safety (Lemond Johnson) last season. No, he won't be in the two deep again for the foreseeable future.
Swafford is listed even though he's a walk on because he actually started some last season.
What are you talking about? Swafford played at least twice as much as Arnold on defense and special teams. He had a TD on defense AND special teams and even started in a few games. Arnold pretty much only played garbage time or if one of our safety's had to sit out a play.There was very little difference in the total amount of playing time, especially when special teams play is counted. So, your argument is extremely weak.
I believe that Treece left him out cause he is white. Really, there is no other possible explanation. I saw on rivals today that Arnold is still on the 2 deep chart. The lack of notice that gets from the media is, well, it is really weird. It is the day and age in which we live.
Do I like to see white boys getting some playing time. You betchya. Especially home grown ones. I believe at least 90% of the white folks in this state feel the same way. We do not want a white kid to play over a black kid if the black kid is better, of course not. But we also do not want a black kid to play over a white kid if the white kid is better. I would like to see the numbers: what is Arnold's 40 time compared to Randolph, McNeil. What is his bench, squat, short shuddle time, long shuttle time, all these things compared to the safeties there now and the ones coming in August.
Also, one last thing. How many of those Missouri offensive linemen would have gotten playing time at UT last year if they were at UT instead of Missouri. I'll answer that for you. Not a one. Not one single one of them. And yet, they put on a blocking clinic for our line didn't they. So, what does that tell you.
Please STOP. You are making a big deal out of nothing and making yourself look bad. Arnold will not be a factor so stop making it something that it really isn't.There was very little difference in the total amount of playing time, especially when special teams play is counted. So, your argument is extremely weak.
I believe that Treece left him out cause he is white. Really, there is no other possible explanation. I saw on rivals today that Arnold is still on the 2 deep chart. The lack of notice that gets from the media is, well, it is really weird. It is the day and age in which we live.
Do I like to see white boys getting some playing time. You betchya. Especially home grown ones. I believe at least 90% of the white folks in this state feel the same way. We do not want a white kid to play over a black kid if the black kid is better, of course not. But we also do not want a black kid to play over a white kid if the white kid is better. I would like to see the numbers: what is Arnold's 40 time compared to Randolph, McNeil. What is his bench, squat, short shuddle time, long shuttle time, all these things compared to the safeties there now and the ones coming in August.
Also, one last thing. How many of those Missouri offensive linemen would have gotten playing time at UT last year if they were at UT instead of Missouri. I'll answer that for you. Not a one. Not one single one of them. And yet, they put on a blocking clinic for our line didn't they. So, what does that tell you.