Did anyone see Olbermann's commentary last night?

#27
#27
He talked a while back about the sacrifices Americans would have to make for the war effort, his sacrifice? Golf. And he lied about that.

He again played the old faulty intelligence card, and I think we all know what the issue is with the faulty intelligence crap. Namely, it's another lie.

There's more, but I will just say that I agree with Olbermann on most of it. Some of you guys probably won't and that's completely fine, but he certainly made some good points.
 
#33
#33
People are just fed up with polticians, as cliche as that is to say. People that dislike Bush tend to leave out the part about Congress' rating.
 
#35
#35
why do people fail to realize that Congress is still almost half Republican. People disapprove of your guys too buddy.

True but the libs are in the majority and the majority leadership made so many promises they couldn't and or wouldn't deliver on it's pathetic. Pelosi is easily as incompetent as Bush.
 
#36
#36
After listening to Olbermann's rant, which sounded like it was delivered with more spittle than a Sylvester and Tweetie cartoon, I will no longer be able to take seriously the left's claims that Fox News isn't fair and balanced.

There is no one on FNC, not even the opinion hosts like O'Reilly or Hannity, blinded by their own ideology like Olbermann is blinded by his.
 
#37
#37
Is Olbermann going to tell Obama to "shut the hell up"? After the POTUS delivered a speech half way around the world where he never mentioned Obama's name, yet Obama seems outraged and offended.
 
#38
#38
holy crap,

I just realized this wasn't just a humorous rhetorical with very obvious answer.
 
#39
#39
After listening to Olbermann's rant, which sounded like it was delivered with more spittle than a Sylvester and Tweetie cartoon, I will no longer be able to take seriously the left's claims that Fox News isn't fair and balanced.

There is no such thing as fair and balanced cable news.
 
#40
#40
Is Olbermann going to tell Obama to "shut the hell up"? After the POTUS delivered a speech half way around the world where he never mentioned Obama's name, yet Obama seems outraged and offended.

You know what I found funny? Obama can sit through Wright's sermons for 20 years and never hear one outrageous sermon but he hears a minute clip and just knows Bush's comments were for him. Wow, just wow.
 
#41
#41
You know what I found funny? Obama can sit through Wright's sermons for 20 years and never hear one outrageous sermon but he hears a minute clip and just knows Bush's comments were for him. Wow, just wow.

It is obvious Bush was taking a pot shot at Carter....

Obama must have a guilty conscious.
 
#42
#42
Is Olbermann going to tell Obama to "shut the hell up"? After the POTUS delivered a speech half way around the world where he never mentioned Obama's name, yet Obama seems outraged and offended.

I thought it was fairly obvious who GW was talking about.
 
#44
#44
Carter...or how about no one? He was speaking to the Israeli government...he did not necessarily have to mean anyone. Just conveying an idea.

Are you serious? Then what the hell was the point in saying it? Yes, I will concede that it may not have been directed solely at Obama, but this has been a major talking point from Sen. Obama's opposition since he began his campaign. We are quickly approaching generals. There is absolutely no way that comment wasn't in some way about Obama.
 
#45
#45
To me it would make the most sense that it was directed at Carter who has done just that recently. If Bush had been actively campaigning for McCain recently I might think otherwise .
 
#46
#46
Are you serious? Then what the hell was the point in saying it? Yes, I will concede that it may not have been directed solely at Obama, but this has been a major talking point from Sen. Obama's opposition since he began his campaign. We are quickly approaching generals. There is absolutely no way that comment wasn't in some way about Obama.

Come on, given the audience and the content, it was solely a shot at Carter.
 
#49
#49
I thought it was fairly obvious who GW was talking about.

yep, every surrender monkey than thinks appeasement as national policy works.

The dems have a pretty thin skin here (I wonder why?). They would have been far better served to say the President is absolutely correct.
 
#50
#50
yep, every surrender monkey than thinks appeasement as national policy works.

The dems have a pretty thin skin here (I wonder why?). They would have been far better served to say the President is absolutely correct.

It is amusing how quickly they rushed to defend their position?

Wouldn't it have faired them better never to have acknowledge the comment?

I am telling you it is a guilty conscious.
 

VN Store



Back
Top