Did we "run" these plays though?

[Orange_Crush]

I may be 100% wrong, but I have a hard time believing they think running Worley a lot is a good idea.

In other words, half this board can run at Worley speed. The only time he's looked good running is when Austin Peay was sniffing glue on the opposite side of the field.

You don't have to run it a lot. Just make it a possibility and they have to defend against it.

 

[lonelawyer]

Worley is not a runner and he knows that. He's just a pro-style pocket passer.
GO VOLS!

Not sure the poster meant that literally.

 

[PACKERVOL]

As some said, this is why CJ is opening up the QB position this week. If we go with one of the guys not named Worley, be prepared for some turnovers. However, Worley cannot run this offense like it needs to be run. Unless one of the freshmen really shows out this week, the likely choice is Peterman. It's time to give someone else a shot. Some times you have to roll the dice, and hope for the best. At this point, I would be OK with any of the other three starting just for a change of pace, but knowing ahead of time that it could backfire on us, I won't be upset if it doesn't work. So, we try the other guys and see what they can do.

 

[lexkyvol]

I guess my other question is why did CBJ not actually call specific QB run plays? If Worley wasn't pulling when CBJ thought he should've? Don't blame a QB for not running when the coach could easily call a specific running play.

bwahahahahahaaaaaaa....right.....unbelievable

 

[orangeluvr]

An effective dual threat makes the running backs more productive and effective. :question: :idea:

Forgot to say it also keeps the D off balance and constantly guessing. :yes: