n_huffhines
What's it gonna cost?
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 87,354
- Likes
- 52,542
Yes they can. A digital copy isn't considered permanent ownership by studios/networks.
It appears you are right to an extent. There was a copyright dispute over 1984 and Animal Farm and Kindle users had their copies removed (and they were reimbursed).
Not sure you should be too worried about a studio or platform removing your digital copy because they don't want you to have it. Would cost them $ and they risk a class action lawsuit.
"There’s a lot of meaning built into the phrase ‘buy now,’” Perzanowski said. “It’s not saying ‘rent now.’ It’s not saying ‘gain conditional access.’ It says ‘buy,’ and that means something very specific to most consumers -- something that, in the case of digital content, isn’t true.”
Column: When you buy digital content on Amazon or iTunes, you don't exactly own it
Hilary is right about this. It's what doomed Girl Meets World from the start on Disney Channel. It wasn't able to tackle any of coming of age stories the way BMW did back in the day on ABC.
GMW should have aired on Freeform instead. IMO
The same problems will effect the upcoming Mighty Ducks series as well.
I don't care as much about production value as long as it's entertaining. I'm just saying that Disney+ is going to have to have something appealing for adults or as they say in tv ratings speak the 15-30 crowd. I think they realize that which is why they have moved The Right Stuff miniseries from National Geographic to D+.These days, PG-13 is almost always teen trash it seems. PG, G, and R are where the better productions typically come from, IMO.
I don't care as much about production value as long as it's entertaining. I'm just saying that Disney+ is going to have to have something appealing for adults or as they say in tv ratings speak the 15-30 crowd. I think they realize that which is why they have moved The Right Stuff miniseries from National Geographic to D+.
They only released 2. My kids were the right age for me to see the first one about a dozen times. I only saw the second one a couple of times. I thought the first one was pretty entertaining (at least the first several times)
LOL, I didn't see my first HP film or read the book series until I was in my mid 30's.I was never a Harry Potter fan. It came out when I was in my mid 20s and just didn’t interest me. But now I have kids that are super into it so I’ve become a fan by proxy. Seeing these other YA series that have used a similar formula to be successful books yet fail in the adaption to film just makes HP all the more impressive to me. For the entire cast to hold together (with the untimely death of Dumbledor excluded) for 9 movies is really just an impressive feat of movie making. Even Chronicles of Narnia, which is a classic series that paved the way for HP in many ways, didn’t sustain that level of stability.