fade route
Just being honest
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2011
- Messages
- 17,397
- Likes
- 16,185
A phrase that is becoming more and more commonplace in football is, "It was a non-contact injury.". Players are doing it to themselves. Compare Curt's weight to the offensive linemen on the 1951 NCs.
My opinion...so far...he has been all promise and no real, lasting performance. This is due to his obvious "tender nature". This year can either further confirm that...or prove me wrong. But so far...he is more cupcake than pork chop. IMHO
It's a legitimate question and I'm not interested in getting flamed for it.
I love the kid. He's well spoken, represents the University well, he has great football tenacity and is a wonderful teammate.
Since he's been here though he's been banged up almost the entire time. Has he went more than a month or two without being injured in some capacity? Other than a few days early in fall camp he's been limited this season as well.
How much can this team truly rely on his presence?
Michael Irvin is the player I couldn't remember the last name of.
No football player is a cupcake though....even the ones who are not looking to get hit or deal out a hit...are still not cupcakes.
It is a brutal sport where injuries happen.
There is a reason though people who are older get injured easier than people who are younger. Bones density.
I do agree that this year will tell a lot more about whether he is injury prone or just bad luck....the questions will be answered.
Michael Irvin is the player I couldn't remember the last name of.
No football player is a cupcake though....even the ones who are not looking to get hit or deal out a hit...are still not cupcakes.
It is a brutal sport where injuries happen.
There is a reason though people who are older get injured easier than people who are younger. Bones density.
I do agree that this year will tell a lot more about whether he is injury prone or just bad luck....the questions will be answered.
Ligaments, which are very commonly injured, absolutely do not change in size or strength based on conditioning. Some players are most definitely genetically predisposed to injury. The factors involved in a particular players injury risk are too numerous to list other than to say it is absolutely true that some body types are better suited to withstand certain sports.
Michael Irvin is the player I couldn't remember the last name of.
No football player is a cupcake though....even the ones who are not looking to get hit or deal out a hit...are still not cupcakes.
It is a brutal sport where injuries happen.
There is a reason though people who are older get injured easier than people who are younger. Bones density.
I do agree that this year will tell a lot more about whether he is injury prone or just bad luck....the questions will be answered.
It is interesting that some guys seem to never get injured even at a high contact position. In fact, I don't remember seeing guys like walter payton, barry sanders, and emmit smith missing alot of time with injuries over their careers. Maybe my memory isn't the best though.
I think we should all just go run into on coming traffic and get hit by a few cars from time to time. We then might be able to understand exactly what his body is put through on a regular basis.
My guess is that we would all be considered 'soft'.
He lacks football durability and football talent. When he hasn't been hurt, he's played in 20 games and has registered a whopping 2 solo tackles per game and 2.5 total sacks over those 20 games. That's about one sack for every ten games, pretty pathetic if you ask me. It's time this guy contribute, or get on down the road.