milohimself
RIP CITY
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2004
- Messages
- 48,891
- Likes
- 31
I held no faith in him as either a real IMF reformer with a Road to Damascus moment nor as a French socialist. He has been described as a "chimpanzee in heat" in the French press for his notorious womanizing.
Whether it is as it reads remains to be seen. My first thought (especially in light of Julian Assange) is maybe he really did have a road to Damascus moment, and this is a set-up.
As always though, evidence from the real world will define my final opinion.
are French socialists any better than other socialists?
and if you're worried about his claiming to be a socialist while living a very bourgeois lifestyle, welcome to the real world. "Socialism" is never for the socialist, especially those who deem themselves too important to be caught up in the mundane life of the proletariat.
Perhaps DSK did assume the trappings of the party of Mitterrand. I might be generous to the French socialists, although I would like to think Andre Gorz still has some resonance there. Again, I have never bought his socialist credentials, as I said. I believe, in fact, he was driven to the hotel by his communications tsar in a Porsche.
give a socialist power and he/she becomes a capitalist real quick, especially once he/she holds the keys to the treasury.
this is why I don't understand your hero-worship of the Castro brothers, they are bigger hypocrites than DSK.
How has Cuba not been a success? Especially given the antagonisms it has had to endure?
Raul Castro's government has relied in particular on a provision of the Cuban Criminal Code that allows the state to imprison individuals before they have committed a crime, on the suspicion that they might commit an offense in the future. This "dangerousness" provision is overtly political, defining as "dangerous" any behavior that contradicts socialist norms. The most Orwellian of Cuba's laws, it captures the essence of the Cuban government's
repressive mindset, which views anyone who acts out of step with the government as a
potential threat and thus worthy of punishment.
Actually Castro has been true to his politics for over 50 years.
The great success of Cuba has been its flexibility as a socialist state. They have never subscribed to Marxist dogma and theory; they have chopped and changed as the situation demanded - much as Capitalism must reinvent itself almost continuously to sustain itself.
Castro has ZERO cult-of-personality. Not one street or picture or statue of him is anywhere. As far as I know, Che has only one statue, at his grave.
I think DSK is a hypocrit. I don't know if he is a sexual predator, but if I were a betting man I would put it at 70/30 right now. Castro, however, was right: history will absolve him.
"Executions?" Che Guevara exclaimed while addressing the hallowed halls of the U.N. General Assembly on December 9, 1964. "Certainly we execute!" he declared, to the claps and cheers of that august body. "And we will CONTINUE executing as long as it is necessary! This is a war to the DEATH against the revolution's enemies!"
According to the Black Book of Communism, those firing-squad executions had reached around 10,000 by that time. Sloboban Milosevic, by the way, went on trial for allegedly ordering 8,000 executions. The charge against him by the same U.N. that deliriously applauded Che Guevara's proud proclamation was "genocide."
"I don't need proof to execute a man," snapped Che to a judicial underling in 1959. "I only need proof that it's necessary to execute him!"
Elian looks as though he's been brainwashed into a good little member of the Kommunisticheskii Soyuz Molodyozhi.