Donald Trump Is Putin's Man

#601
#601
OrangeTsar said:
Only way it is a crime is if he used campaign funds
Click to expand...

I agree that it should be, but that's not what they're attempting to claim. Rather that any money he spent on a personal issue could be see as political therefore related to his campaign. Which is an absurd standard.
 
#602
#602
Vol8188 said:
I agree that it should be, but that's not what they're attempting to claim. Rather that any money he spent on a personal issue could be see as political therefore related to his campaign. Which is an absurd standard.
Click to expand...
The timing of the payment, in October of 2016, is impossible to ignore.
 
#605
#605
Vol8188 said:
I agree that it should be, but that's not what they're attempting to claim. Rather that any money he spent on a personal issue could be see as political therefore related to his campaign. Which is an absurd standard.
Click to expand...
By that standard, if Biden helped Hunter with legal bills to keep his name out of the news, we can prosecute that too, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188 and hog88
#606
#606
IluvdoubleD's said:
Dude is having a panic attack over his upcoming court battles. You can say "got him now" all you want, but nothing has begun yet. Dude is about to be in so many courts at once his head will spin into next week. Georgia is about to take him to task... and NY... and Dominion, and a handful of brave women. And then there's our hero Jack Smith standing right behind him when he finally turns around.
Click to expand...
😂🤡
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#607
#607
hog88 said:
It doesn't matter. If it came from Trumps personal funds there is nothing illegal about that.
Click to expand...
Donald Trump, Michael Cohen and the Stormy Daniels payment: a Q & A

While it is perfectly legal for a candidate to contribute unlimited amounts of money to their own campaign, the money must be disclosed on campaign finance reports .... It wasn't .... presumably, because Donald Trump didn't want the purpose of the $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels to be scrutinized.
 
#609
#609
lawgator1 said:
And suggests strongly that if he becomes POTUS he will not support, or will at least greatly reduce support for, Ukraine.

It will be interesting to see how he handles that specific question when he eventually has to face media.
Click to expand...
Are you saying that not supporting what is going on in Ukraine= supporting Putin?
 
#610
#610
BowlBrother85 said:
Donald Trump, Michael Cohen and the Stormy Daniels payment: a Q & A

While it is perfectly legal for a candidate to contribute unlimited amounts of money to their own campaign, the money must be disclosed on campaign finance reports .... It wasn't .... presumably, because Donald Trump didn't want the purpose of the $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels to be scrutinized.
Click to expand...

Nice try. If the money never passed through his campaign it is a personal expense and nothing illegal occurred.

If they want to go down that route they need to start charging every candidate that pays for a haircut or makeover prior to a debate with their own cash since it was done for campaign purposes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188
#611
#611
hog88 said:
Nice try. If the money never passed through his campaign it is a personal expense and nothing illegal occurred.
Click to expand...
The money did pass through the 2016 Donald Trump Presidential Campaign, by way of Michael Cohen, who worked for the campaign as an attorney. Cohen was listed on the 2016 Trump Campaign payroll under legal staff.
 
#612
#612
BowlBrother85 said:
The money did pass through the 2016 Donald Trump Presidential Campaign, by way of Michael Cohen, who worked as an attorney and spokesperson for the campaign. Cohen was listed on the 2016 Trump Campaign payroll under legal staff.
Click to expand...

He was also his personal attorney. Did it pass through a campaign specific account?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
#613
#613
BowlBrother85 said:
The money did pass through the 2016 Donald Trump Presidential Campaign, by way of Michael Cohen, who worked as an attorney and spokesperson for the campaign. Cohen was listed on the 2016 Trump Campaign payroll under legal staff.
Click to expand...

Passing through MCs hands who also acted as a personal rep for Trump doesn't mean it went through his campaign. There is a reason the feds dropped this, they couldn't find where the money went through campaign accounts and if it didn't no crime was committed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188
#614
#614
hog88 said:
Passing through MCs hands who also acted as a personal rep for Trump doesn't mean it went through his campaign. There is a reason the feds dropped this, they couldn't find where the money went through campaign accounts and if it didn't no crime was committed.
Click to expand...
Yes, it does.

The money was funneled through a shell company that Cohen had opened to conceal the source of the payment. Cohen has explained this, and said that the purpose of the Stormy Daniels payment was to prevent her from damaging the campaign.
 
#615
#615
BowlBrother85 said:
Yes, it does.

The money was funneled through a shell company that Cohen had opened to conceal the source of the payment. Cohen has explained this, and said that the purpose of the Stormy Daniels payment was to prevent her from damaging the campaign.
Click to expand...

Find that direct quote.
 
#616
#616
Vol8188 said:
He was also his personal attorney. Did it pass through a campaign specific account?
Click to expand...
It passed through the account of a shell company that Cohen opened for the specific purpose of concealing the source of the $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels.

In other words, perfectly normal conduct that wouldn't arouse suspicion at all if uncovered.
 
#617
#617
BowlBrother85 said:
It passed through the account of a shell company that Cohen opened for the specific purpose of concealing the source of the $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels.

In other words, perfectly normal conduct that wouldn't arouse suspicion at all if uncovered.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I’m really not seeing the suspicious part here. What’s the problem
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88
#618
#618
BowlBrother85 said:
It passed through the account of a shell company that Cohen opened for the specific purpose of concealing the source of the $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels.

In other words, perfectly normal conduct that wouldn't arouse suspicion at all if uncovered.
Click to expand...
So if Cohen had said it was simply not to Tarnish Trumps good name,:rolleyes: it would be okay, but since he said damage the campaign, it is illegal?
 
#622
#622
BowlBrother85 said:
Yes, it does.

The money was funneled through a shell company that Cohen had opened to conceal the source of the payment. Cohen has explained this, and said that the purpose of the Stormy Daniels payment was to prevent her from damaging the campaign.
Click to expand...

Good luck proving it. There is a reason the feds dropped it
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top