Don't ask, Don't tell repealed

#452
#452
wells.jpg
 
#454
#454
JTrainDavis said:
Thats dumb. People have a right to disagree with the new policy, but as long as they do their hitch they are more than worthy.
Click to expand...

If they want to leave when their time is up, then that's their right. But this is a poor excuse.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#455
#455
Ed12111 said:
"Then the animal is clearly consenting"

No. The animal is not consenting for the same reason a child doing the "giving" isn't consenting. Neither the animal or child has the mental aptitude to consent.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure how many "children" are physically capable of doing the "giving."

I acknowledge your point, however. Mental capacity should definitely determine consent.
 
#456
#456
DinkinFlicka said:
+1

So gs, you're not blaming the soldiers who can't stomach the thought of serving alongside OPENLY gay personnel? I think it's a shame.
Click to expand...

Why would I condemn them?? It's a free country, that is their choice and we have a voluntary military so far, although this may lead right back to conscription and that isn't a good thing.

The point of my post though is that the pentagon report misrepresented the facts for political purposes.

You keep using the pc buzz words; 'OPENLY gay', can you define that term for me??
 
#458
#458
gsvol said:
'OPENLY gay', can you define that term for me??
Click to expand...

Voluntary disclosure of identification, classification or acknowledgment of being homosexual, or participating in homosexual behavior.


Antonym:

Closeted Gay:
Voluntary repression of identification, classification or acknowledgement of being homosexual, or participating in homosexual behavior.
 
#459
#459
OJ said:
When this gay thing is accepted and all calms down I vote to accept all those people that Are still in the closet hideing there having animal sex. After all sexual preference shouldn't matter.
Click to expand...

What, are you going to leave out the necropheliacs???

The rewriting of the UCMJ is going to be interesting.

First question is will congress do that or will some agency of the executive branch do so?
 
#461
#461
MG1968 said:
how is a repeal of DADT going to lead to conscription?
Click to expand...

DUH?

Would that not be intuitively obvious to even the most casual of observers??

I'll speak slowly and use little words.

If manpower needs of our military aren't met with volunteers, what do we do instead to fill the ranks??




fl0at said:
Voluntary disclosure of identification, classification or acknowledgment of being homosexual, or participating in homosexual behavior.
Click to expand...

At what point does ones' 'voluntary disclosure of being homosexual' cross some imaginary line into becoming 'the flaunting of one's homosexual behavior?'
 
#462
#462
gsvol said:
At what point does ones' 'voluntary disclosure of being homosexual' cross some imaginary line into becoming 'the flaunting of one's homosexual behavior?'
Click to expand...

Usually right after the pronouncement of "You may kiss the bride."

Oh, I thought you said heterosexual.

I guess the answer would be who the hell cares?
 
#463
#463
Vol_4_Life said:
You are a beacon of tolerance.
Click to expand...

Volitile is very tolerant as long as you are in total agreement with him, otherwise you are a bafoonish, ignorant nincompoop. There are a few others on here that are in lock step with him and they all remind me of Dolly clones.

Ever notice that those who havn't served and aren't likely to ever serve are the ones most likely to denegrate those who don't think this policy change is a wise move???
 
#464
#464
gsvol said:
Ever notice that those who havn't served and aren't likely to ever serve are the ones most likely to denegrate those who don't think this policy change is a wise move???
Click to expand...

Most of the people in this thread, who have served, are in support of this policy change. They have also been pretty vocal against those who disagree with the policy change.
 
#465
#465
fl0at said:
Usually right after the pronouncement of "You may kiss the bride."

Oh, I thought you said heterosexual.

I guess the answer would be who the hell cares?
Click to expand...

Evidently Volatile and Dunkinflunky are quite passionate about the topic.

From a wider scope the question is about whether or not there will be any significant disruption of national defense capability which should entail at least some 'care' from every citizen.

I havn't mentioned it before but this can potentially lend credence to the islamic claims that America is the 'great satan' and the babylon that should be destroyed because of the koranic condemnation of homosexuality.
 
#467
#467
gsvol said:
Evidently Volatile and Dunkinflunky are quite passionate about the topic.

From a wider scope the question is about whether or not there will be any significant disruption of national defense capability which should entail at least some 'care' from every citizen.

I havn't mentioned it before but this can potentially lend credence to the islamic claims that America is the 'great satan' and the babylon that should be destroyed because of the koranic condemnation of homosexuality.
Click to expand...

You are bending the responses, yet again. Volatile and DF are not quite passionate about some "line in regards to flaunting."

They are passionate about equality. If a homosexual feels the need to "flaunt," then they are within their rights to do so.

You asked for a definition, and received one. You then absurdly bent the response, uselessly.

In short, you are bad at this.

Oh, look... you and Islam have something in common.
 
#468
#468
gsvol said:
Evidently Volatile and Dunkinflunky are quite passionate about the topic.

From a wider scope the question is about whether or not there will be any significant disruption of national defense capability which should entail at least some 'care' from every citizen.

I havn't mentioned it before but this can potentially lend credence to the islamic claims that America is the 'great satan' and the babylon that should be destroyed because of the koranic condemnation of homosexuality.
Click to expand...

See, I don't think this is a problem. People in the military are going to do their job. If they don't, they'll get booted out. I imagine there was this same problem when women joined. I've been around plenty of women who do their jobs, and plenty who don't. If a gay guy can go through what I went through, more power to him.

And who gives a **** what some whackjob muslims have to say? We could be completely chill and they'd still want to cut out our throats. Piss on you for even "giving credence" to that line of thought.
 
#469
#469
fl0at said:
You are bending the responses, yet again. Volatile and DF are not quite passionate about some "line in regards to flaunting."

They are passionate about equality. If a homosexual feels the need to "flaunt," then they are within their rights to do so.

You asked for a definition, and received one. You then absurdly bent the response, uselessly.

In short, you are bad at this.

Oh, look... you and Islam have something in common.
Click to expand...


Well flaunt away then.


RhodeIslandVol said:
See, I don't think this is a problem. People in the military are going to do their job. If they don't, they'll get booted out. I imagine there was this same problem when women joined. I've been around plenty of women who do their jobs, and plenty who don't. If a gay guy can go through what I went through, more power to him.

And who gives a **** what some whackjob muslims have to say? We could be completely chill and they'd still want to cut out our throats. Piss on you for even "giving credence" to that line of thought.
Click to expand...

peeingman.gif
 
#473
#473
gsvol said:
DUH?

Would that not be intuitively obvious to even the most casual of observers??

I'll speak slowly and use little words.

If manpower needs of our military aren't met with volunteers, what do we do instead to fill the ranks??
'
Click to expand...

are you really that daft?

when you can show us that recruiting levels are down because of the repeal of DADT, I'll concede the point to you.
 
#475
#475
gsvol said:
intuitively obvious to even the most casual of observers?
Click to expand...

Lol... I think this is the 10th or so time I've seen him use this exact expression. He must like it!

Reminds of a way lamer version of Clooney's character from "Oh Brother Where Art Thou?"

EDIT: waaaaaaay lamer
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top