Don't worry too much gop'ers

#51
#51
What do you not understand?


Well for one, you're not very good at setting up a wager. You make about 0.5 posts a day. Why would someone that probably averages 10 posts a day, at the least, want to make that wager with you. Obviously you value posting on here less than a person that posts often. Really should learn to set up bets better.
 
#52
#52
Well for one, you're not very good at setting up a wager. You make about 0.5 posts a day. Why would someone that probably averages 10 posts a day, at the least, want to make that wager with you. Obviously you value posting on here less than a person that posts often. Really should learn to set up bets better.
I was wondering when someone might point that out.I did offer hpv 2 years bannishment if I lost to his one he still would not take it.
 
#53
#53
I was wondering when someone might point that out.I did offer hpv 2 years bannishment if I lost to his one he still would not take it.
but surely you understand that without ENIGMA, I couldn't figure out what you were trying to say.
 
#54
#54
enigma.jpg
 
#55
#55
I was wondering when someone might point that out.I did offer hpv 2 years bannishment if I lost to his one he still would not take it.

Still a poor bet. Wanting Obama to lose and their actually being enough sane people in this country to make that happen are 2 different things.
 
#56
#56

You know damn well 615 is correct if I was part of your gop choir I could post the exact same post word for word daily and you would say nothing.The only time I post the polls for congress is when one of you all post how bad the dems are doing in congress so why don't you post something about people posting how bad the dems are doing in congress?I'll tell you why cause they agree with you.As far as the bet posts I put it in 2 posts yesterday for the first time EVER you don't like what I post take the bet and maybe you'll be rid of me for a year.:)

1st off, I don't really care who you vote for, you're annoying and even your fellow libs on here find you annoying. 2nd, you post the same link every time, trying to somehow point out that The D's are more popular, when most polls show they're in the same boat as the R's. 3rd, enough with the indentions.
 
#59
#59
1st off, I don't really care who you vote for, you're annoying and even your fellow libs on here find you annoying. 2nd, you post the same link every time, trying to somehow point out that The D's are more popular, when most polls show they're in the same boat as the R's. 3rd, enough with the indentions.
First off the only lib on here that has said that is emain and personally I could care less what anyone on here thinks I'm annoying or not.Second I post the same link with many different polls when one of you all posts how bad the dems are doing in congress.Third glad to know it annoys you.
 
#60
#60

First off the only lib on here that has said that is emain and personally I could care less what anyone on here thinks I'm annoying or not.Second I post the same link with many different polls when one of you all posts how bad the dems are doing in congress.Third glad to know it annoys you.

Your idiotic posts sure put me in my place.
 
#62
#62
DA is there a reason why you want socialism?
I don't want pure socailism but I believe in regulation of some industries.Pure capitalism is not perfect either those with the means will basically control any and everything.
 
#63
#63

I don't want pure socailism but I believe in regulation of some industries.Pure capitalism is not perfect either those with the means will basically control any and everything.

Capitalism > Socialism all day long.
 
#64
#64
whomever DAVOL posts this encrypted stuff for, could you please share the cipher key so that we can all understand? Thank you.

Hold on BPV. I am running his stuff through our supercomputers now. I will let you know as soon as they come up with something.
 
#65
#65
I don't want pure socailism but I believe in regulation of some industries.Pure capitalism is not perfect either those with the means will basically control any and everything.

Why is more government the answer?
 
#67
#67
Why is more government the answer?
Well if the government is run properly they are suppose to look out for a majority of the people they represent on the other hand if business and corporations runs everything they look out for themselves and their shareholders.
 
#68
#68
Well if the government is run properly they are suppose to look out for a majority of the people they represent on the other hand if business and corporations runs everything they look out for themselves and their shareholders.

You know that is complete bull$hit!

:eek:k:
 
#72
#72

Well if the government is run properly they are suppose to look out for a majority of the people they represent on the other hand if business and corporations runs everything they look out for themselves and their shareholders.

In your opinion, what areas of the government have ever operated properly or are operating properly now?
 
#73
#73
Because the government subsidizes it. Thus people use it carelessly and kill the environment.
I do not tend to get on here and post about environmental issues or the price of oil. I do believe there is some price manipulation going on though.I posted the SA gas price for fun to see what response I would get.
 
#74
#74
In your opinion, what areas of the government have ever operated properly or are operating properly now?
See that's the catch for the most part you can't tell the difference between the corps. and the gov. they all look out for themselves.Atleast it seems.
 
#75
#75
I do not tend to get on here and post about environmental issues or the price of oil. I do believe there is some price manipulation going on though.I posted the SA gas price for fun to see what response I would get.

Nothing wrong with posting it. It is a legitimate example of a government involvement. I think it is 12 cents in Venezuela. My environmental quip was tongue in cheek but actually holds merit.
 

VN Store



Back
Top