I don't follow why more exploration and extraction makes us more vulnerable then not exploring and extracting.
Right now, it is assumed we have some domestic supply laying around untapped. That has to be worth something. When we can no longer have anything to chant "drill" about, we will totally be at outsiders' mercy.
Just my take. And it seems likely most of the "easy" oil is either being tapped or is gone. I know I'm going to get shot for this, but accidents like the one we had last summer are going to be a lot more likely as we push into areas that are more difficult to extract from.
As a counter argument - by preventing exploration and attempts at extraction we stunt the learning curve we need to get at oil that is increasingly harder to reach. We are putting it on hold rather than advancing exploration and extraction techniques.
I believe there were bans stretching back to the late 60s. Some are state based some are federal. Congress hasn't had a taste for more drilling either.
Again, what's the end-game? At a certain point, we have to get off oil. Why not do it while there is a safety-net of there still being some around, rather than waiting until we get into a apocalyptic scenario where society will utterly collapse in x months unless we miraculously find a new source of portable fuel? We can't really develop alternatives until it is economically viable to do so.
Exactly.
You want to debate oil drilling policy I think a heckuva an argument cna be made that we need to reexamine that, and not just because of the last few weeks.
But the OP's clear intent was to assail this as Obama's fault and that is utter nonsense.
so the last time oil went this high is was through no fault of Bush?
So a republican president and congress, and at a time when most states were leaning republican, did not make it a priority, is what you are saying.
agree in principle, but why torpedo the economy in the meanwhile? it's fairly obvious we aren't on the verge of solving our energy problems.
Again, what's the end-game? At a certain point, we have to get off oil. Why not do it while there is a safety-net of there still being some around, rather than waiting until we get into a apocalyptic scenario where society will utterly collapse in x months unless we miraculously find a new source of portable fuel? We can't really develop alternatives until it is economically viable to do so.
Why would we be? Drill baby, drill. We don't even bat an eye at 3 bucks at the pump right now. That tells you how deep our need for oil still is and how far things will have to go before people start taking this seriously, rather than recalling when they could fill up for less than a dollar a gallon and acting like they have a right to cheap fuel or a certain lifestyle, regardless of the price.
Yes we have to get off it eventually but what is the point of leaving it in the ground?
Do you really believe that US drilling bans will move the world off of oil more quickly? With less pain/turmoil? I just don't see it.