Drink opens today's presser apologizing to referees

#1

wmcovol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2012
Messages
18,375
Likes
33,091
#1
Said he was wrong, should not have used bad language and should keep his mind more on the game...in a ho hum kinda way. Pretty clear the AD or above her (SEC office) talked with him. Bitching about officials isnt tolerated in the SEC world.

You can find it on Youtube if you want to see it.
 
#2
#2
Said he was wrong, should not have used bad language and should keep his mind more on the game...in a ho hum kinda way. Pretty clear the AD or above her (SEC office) talked with him. Bitching about officials isnt tolerated in the SEC world.

You can find it on Youtube if you want to see it.

This brings up a good point for the conspiracy guys - the SEC refs will be flag happy against Dink, and they will want UT UGA game on CBS to be for all the marbles, so naturally expect us to get all kinds of good calls and no holding etc.
šŸ˜
 
#3
#3
This brings up a good point for the conspiracy guys - the SEC refs will be flag happy against Dink, and they will want UT UGA game on CBS to be for all the marbles, so naturally expect us to get all kinds of good calls and no holding etc.
šŸ˜
Statistically, I think there's a higher probability of seeing Bigfoot riding the Loch Ness monster down the Tennessee River than to see the officials call a game in our favor.
 
#5
#5
This brings up a good point for the conspiracy guys - the SEC refs will be flag happy against Dink, and they will want UT UGA game on CBS to be for all the marbles, so naturally expect us to get all kinds of good calls and no holding etc.
šŸ˜
Yeah. Because you guys have offered better explanations for clear patterns in penalties, right? It doesn't even have to be some backroom plot. It could be subconscious bias influenced in various ways... including conversations at the SEC offices about how the league needs one loss or undefeated teams to assure a spot in the CFP.

So do you have an alternative, "non-conspiracy" explanation for why UK and Bama got no live ball fouls? Both committed them. Bama committed a lot of them.


It will be interesting to see if that latter part does indeed happen.
 
#6
#6
Statistically, I think there's a higher probability of seeing Bigfoot riding the Loch Ness monster down the Tennessee River than to see the officials call a game in our favor.
You've left out one factor. What outcome in UT's game would best favor the SEC getting a team into the CFP? That very well could be a UT win.
 
#13
#13
Yeah. Because you guys have offered better explanations for clear patterns in penalties, right? It doesn't even have to be some backroom plot. It could be subconscious bias influenced in various ways... including conversations at the SEC offices about how the league needs one loss or undefeated teams to assure a spot in the CFP.

So do you have an alternative, "non-conspiracy" explanation for why UK and Bama got no live ball fouls? Both committed them. Bama committed a lot of them.


It will be interesting to see if that latter part does indeed happen.
If something occurs today that people canā€™t or donā€™t want to acknowledge, they simply label it a ā€œconspiracy theoryā€.
 
#20
#20
This brings up a good point for the conspiracy guys - the SEC refs will be flag happy against Dink, and they will want UT UGA game on CBS to be for all the marbles, so naturally expect us to get all kinds of good calls and no holding etc.
šŸ˜
I honestly wonder if cbs has any pull with the conference to push for ole miss to win and make November 18th have more impact
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol in Buckeye Land
#21
#21
If something occurs today that people canā€™t or donā€™t want to acknowledge, they simply label it a ā€œconspiracy theoryā€.
I am about to start calling ā€œconspiracy theoriesā€ ā€œspoilersā€ considering all the crazy stuff that has turned out to be true these past few years šŸ˜³
 
#22
#22
Said he was wrong, should not have used bad language and should keep his mind more on the game...in a ho hum kinda way. Pretty clear the AD or above her (SEC office) talked with him. Bitching about officials isnt tolerated in the SEC world.

You can find it on Youtube if you want to see it.
So does that make him a good guy or a bad guy with the refs? Heupel keeping quiet sure didn't help his case so I'm gonna guess they lean to Drink being a good guy worthy of forgiveness and they screw UT.
 

VN Store



Back
Top