tnvolsfan85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2008
- Messages
- 24,347
- Likes
- 0
"I've definitely made some mistakes, don't get me wrong," Crews said. "But for the last six months or longer, things have been fine. I'm in good academic standing, so I don't know where the report about the grade issues came from. And coach Pearl said he would speak positively on my character to any coach in the country."
article from the local paper about Duke (some quotes too)
Crews says reports wrong -- dailypress.com
"Coach (Bruce) Pearl and I agreed that I should transfer," said Crews, a former Bethel High star. "All of the negative stuff that I've been reading is really old. There wasn't anything current that would've been a reason for a dismissal. It was just a lot of little things from the past that piled up."
Don't think I said you were a novice. The UT staff also thought Marques Johnson and Tony Passley could contibute at the SEC level. Cronin & Co. thought Alvin Mitchell was worth a scholarship. They're good staffs, they're not perfect.haha...ok. Well, I'm not exactly a novice, and I gotta tell you, I in no way agree with your evaluation. Neither does the UT coaching staff, the Cincy staff, or the UK staff.
All of them think he's absolutely good enough to come in and help right away.
Academically, well, that's a different story.
mm
That's the root of my concern with Bobby Maze. I was informed that was the primary reason for Gary Williams rescinding Bobby's verbal commitment last month.
Don't think I said you were a novice. The UT staff also thought Marques Johnson and Tony Passley could contibute at the SEC level. Cronin & Co. thought Alvin Mitchell was worth a scholarship. They're good staffs, they're not perfect.
It must have been A LOT of little stuff. Why would Pearl just decide it was in everyones best interest to let Duke go if it was just over some little petty stuff? That doesn't make much sense to me.
If there was nothing recent that caused this I don't understand why he would be leaving.
So, according to Duke, he hasn't had "any negative incidents" since being suspended for a month before the start of the season when small amounts of marijuana were found in his on-campus apartment.
And, to take it one step further, he says that he's in solid academic standing.
Just to recap:
-He hasn't had any negative incidents since last fall.
-His academics are just fine.
Yep, this dismissal makes perfect sense. I don't doubt Crews' account one bit.
Add that to that fact that per Jimmy Hyams, he was told by someone today that neither of these guys had run out of strikes (it's either 4 or 5 positive tests before you are expelled, i.e. Coker).
So lets get a tally:
1. No negative incidents since last fall
2. No academic problems
3. No running out of strikes on drug tests
And yet, on the one hand, the coaching staff bends over backwards (and rightfully so may I add) to assist one player that was facing a life threatening illness in Lofton, yet they mysteriously run a guy from Knoxville that had a similar life threatening crisis with his heart, even though he had allegedly turned his life around and was in good academic standing?
Who else is buying this?
Thats why there are rules you break them your gone. I don't feel sorry for people that can't go to class or stay off drugs. I don't like the idea of our players getting in trouble but it gives me an example to tell my son you break the rules you are going to suffer the consiquences no matter how good of a player you are.