bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 74,174
- Likes
- 50,443
Its unfair to say that when you haven't seen them get consistent minutes. It's easy to say our players suck when you don't see them get any minutes, honestly I would be able to judge our depth and player development better next year.That being said...Edwards, Reese, Ndyia, & Chevious don't look a bit better to me now than when they first stepped on campus.
Its unfair to say that when you haven't seen them get consistent minutes. It's easy to say our players suck when you don't see them get any minutes, honestly I would be able to judge our depth and player development better next year.
Point well-taken. I'd also argue one of the reasons they're not getting 'consistent minutes' is because they're not turning any heads in practice.
Either that, or they're not one of the #'s pulled out of the bag that CCM uses to decide sub-patterns.
Its unfair to say that when you haven't seen them get consistent minutes. It's easy to say our players suck when you don't see them get any minutes, honestly I would be able to judge our depth and player development better next year.
This is the hallmark of the CCM player development program.:crazy:
But Moore and Thompson have shown the most progress. actually I think Chievous has downgraded the most don't know why tho